Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Readability Formulas | 5 |
Reading Research | 5 |
Text Structure | 5 |
Readability | 4 |
Difficulty Level | 2 |
Reading Comprehension | 2 |
Academic Standards | 1 |
Achievement Rating | 1 |
Charts | 1 |
Cloze Procedure | 1 |
Content Analysis | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Journal of Adolescent & Adult… | 1 |
Journal of Reading | 1 |
Journal of Technical Writing… | 1 |
Online Submission | 1 |
Theory into Practice | 1 |
Author
Agnihotri, R. K. | 1 |
Connatser, Bradford R. | 1 |
Dreher, Mariam Jean | 1 |
Hiebert, Elfrieda H. | 1 |
Khanna, A. L. | 1 |
Kirsch, Irwin S. | 1 |
Mosenthal, Peter B. | 1 |
Singer, Harry | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 4 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Opinion Papers | 1 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
India | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Hiebert, Elfrieda H. – Online Submission, 2011
A focus of the Common Core State Standards/English Language Arts (CCSS/ELA) is that students become increasingly more capable with complex text over their school careers. This focus has redirected attention to the measurement of text complexity. Although CCSS/ELA suggests multiple criteria for this task, the standards offer a single measure of…
Descriptors: Reading Research, State Standards, Information Sources, Achievement Rating

Mosenthal, Peter B.; Kirsch, Irwin S. – Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 1998
Describes the PMOSE/IKIRSCH document readability formula, which provides a measure of document complexity (looking at structure and density) of a wide array of different document types (including lists, schedules, tables, graphs, charts, indexes, time lines, maps, calendars, and forms). Discusses implications of the formula in terms of document…
Descriptors: Charts, Difficulty Level, Graphs, Higher Education

Connatser, Bradford R. – Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 1999
Proposes that readability formulas cannot predict text difficulty. Presents results of an experiment designed to demonstrate that "text difficulty" is determined by individual differences (perception) and not by the objective qualities of a text. (NH)
Descriptors: Cloze Procedure, Individual Differences, Readability Formulas, Reader Text Relationship

Agnihotri, R. K.; Khanna, A. L. – Journal of Reading, 1992
Shows how a number of readability measures developed in English were applied to a textbook written in Hindi. Emphasizes that the more recent approaches to readability that focus on syntax, conceptual difficulty, and organization are a teacher's best help in selecting materials for students. (SR)
Descriptors: Content Area Reading, Foreign Countries, Hindi, Readability

Dreher, Mariam Jean; Singer, Harry – Theory into Practice, 1989
Explains eight categories of friendly text features: text organization, signaling, discourse consistency, cohesion, explication, conceptual density, metadiscourse, and instructional devices. Extratext determinants of readability (reader, goal, teacher) are also examined. Within the context of two models of reading, the interaction of these…
Descriptors: Content Analysis, Discourse Modes, Intermediate Grades, Readability