Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Adults | 1 |
| Cognitive Processes | 1 |
| Computation | 1 |
| Control Groups | 1 |
| Grammar | 1 |
| Individual Differences | 1 |
| Language Processing | 1 |
| Models | 1 |
| Reading Processes | 1 |
| Reading Rate | 1 |
| Reading Skills | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Cognitive Psychology | 1 |
Author
| Acheson, Daniel J. | 1 |
| Christiansen, Morten H. | 1 |
| MacDonald, Maryellen C. | 1 |
| Race, David S. | 1 |
| Wells, Justine B. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkWells, Justine B.; Christiansen, Morten H.; Race, David S.; Acheson, Daniel J.; MacDonald, Maryellen C. – Cognitive Psychology, 2009
Many explanations of the difficulties associated with interpreting object relative clauses appeal to the demands that object relatives make on working memory. MacDonald and Christiansen [MacDonald, M. C., & Christiansen, M. H. (2002). "Reassessing working memory: Comment on Just and Carpenter (1992) and Waters and Caplan (1996)." "Psychological…
Descriptors: Sentences, Short Term Memory, Language Processing, Word Order
