Descriptor
Author
Armentrout, James A. | 1 |
Finch, A. J., Jr. | 1 |
Hinrichsen, James J. | 1 |
Rogers, Dan L. | 1 |
Sczechowicz, Edward | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Bender Gestalt Test | 4 |
Peabody Picture Vocabulary… | 2 |
Slosson Intelligence Test | 1 |
Wechsler Adult Intelligence… | 1 |
Wechsler Intelligence Scale… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Rogers, Dan L. – Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1980
To assess the utility and reliability of Bender test recall in children, 304 children (ages 5 through 14) were individually administered the copy and recall phases using Koppitz's directions. The recall phase was judged to be of doubtful utility in assessing intellectual functioning in children. (Author/SJL)
Descriptors: Age Differences, Children, Intelligence Tests, Recall (Psychology)

Armentrout, James A. – Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1976
WAIS subtset standard scores, IQ scores, and factorial deviation quotients were correlated with Bender Gestalt recall scores for 111 vocational rehabilitation clients. Results found that the Bender recall task could not classify Ss as to general intelligence level with greater accuracy than could be obtained with the WAIS Vocabulary subtest alone.…
Descriptors: Intelligence, Measurement Instruments, Memory, Predictive Validity

Finch, A. J., Jr.; And Others – Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1983
Children referred for psychological evaluations of completed the Bender-Gestalt and then reproduced designs from memory. Numbers of designs recalled increased with age and Performance Intelligence Quotient. The importance of developmental level in evaluation and establishment of cut-off recall scores for designs were discussed. (Author/RD)
Descriptors: Age Differences, Child Development, Elementary Secondary Education, Intelligence Differences

Sczechowicz, Edward; Hinrichsen, James J. – Journal of Personality Assessment, 1980
Twenty-eight normal and 28 learning disabled children were given the Bender-Gestalt Test under instructional sets of low (standard) attention or high attention. Results failed to support the hypothesis that high attention instructions would lead to differential recall performance of the diagnostic groups.
Descriptors: Attention Span, Children, Control Groups, Elementary Education