Descriptor
Higher Education | 9 |
Recognition (Achievement) | 9 |
College Faculty | 5 |
Educational Quality | 5 |
Institutional Characteristics | 4 |
Reputation | 4 |
Leadership | 3 |
Majority Attitudes | 3 |
Rating Scales | 3 |
Awards | 2 |
College Instruction | 2 |
More ▼ |
Source
Change | 9 |
Author
Astin, Alexander W. | 2 |
Solmon, Lewis C. | 2 |
Bailey, Anne Lowery | 1 |
Bowen, William G. | 1 |
Haines, Richard W. | 1 |
Jones, Gary L. | 1 |
Newman, Frank | 1 |
Orr, Daniel | 1 |
Webster, David S. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 9 |
Opinion Papers | 4 |
Reports - Descriptive | 3 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Change, 1986
A list of approximately 260 faculty nominated by their own institutions for extraordinary contributions to undergraduate education on their campuses and beyond is presented. (MLW)
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Instruction, Higher Education, Leaders

Orr, Daniel – Change, 1984
Opinions about quality are seen as the only relevant measures of quality that can be collected. A different view of quality in higher education, and a different set of university rankings are proposed. A system that draws pairwise comparisons of university performance across nine disciplines is described. (MLW)
Descriptors: Colleges, Comparative Analysis, Educational Quality, Higher Education

Bailey, Anne Lowery – Change, 1986
Profiles of 50 college faculty singled out for honors by their college presidents are presented. These faculty members are identified as responsible leaders and citizens who contribute to the quality of campus life beyond the lecture halls and labs. (MLW)
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Instruction, Higher Education, Leaders

Jones, Gary L.; Haines, Richard W. – Change, 1984
Two educators discuss the advantages and disadvantages of no-need scholarships. A national program of scholarships for high school students about to enter college is advocated by one while the other sees the no-need scholarships as weakening the principle that academic achievement should be its own reward. (MLW)
Descriptors: Academic Ability, Academic Achievement, Academic Standards, Access to Education

Bowen, William G. – Change, 1984
The success of the entire academic enterprise depends directly on the contributions of the junior faculty members. The quality of the junior faculty, the diversity of talent, the promotion/appointment process, and the incentives to value teaching and university citizenship as well as scholarship are discussed. (MLW)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Educational Quality, Faculty College Relationship, Faculty Development

Astin, Alexander W.; Solmon, Lewis C. – Change, 1981
A study on the objective correlates of undergraduate quality ratings, state or regional biases, and other methodological issues relating to reputational ratings of undergraduate quality is reported. The subjective judgments of departmental quality made by college and university faculty were studied. Reputational ratings appear to be redundant with…
Descriptors: Bias, College Faculty, Educational Quality, Factor Analysis

Solmon, Lewis C.; Astin, Alexander W. – Change, 1981
A Higher Education Research Institute pilot study of the reputations of undergraduate departments is discussed. The intent of the study was to quantify the subjective judgments of undergraduate departmental quality and to investigate the association of ratings on different criteria and for different types of institutions. (MLW)
Descriptors: Biology, Chemistry, Departments, Economics

Newman, Frank – Change, 1987
College presidents nominated students to receive the Robinson Student Humanitarian Achievement Award honoring their commitment to community service. The four winners, George Arnold Cuevas Antillon, Eileen Doyle, Diane Koucky, and Joseph O'Brien, are interviewed. (MLW)
Descriptors: Awards, College Administration, College Students, Community Problems

Webster, David S. – Change, 1981
Ranking American colleges, universities, and individual departments according to their academic quality is discussed. Six types of methodology used are identified: reputational rankings; faculty awards, honors, and prizes; citations in citation indexes; alumni achievements; scores of entering students on standardized tests; and institutional…
Descriptors: Alumni, Awards, Citations (References), College Faculty