Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Accuracy | 3 |
Recognition (Psychology) | 3 |
Visual Discrimination | 3 |
Identification | 2 |
Memory | 2 |
Cognitive Processes | 1 |
Cognitive Psychology | 1 |
College Students | 1 |
Crime | 1 |
Criminals | 1 |
Decision Making Skills | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Averell, Lee | 1 |
Brown, Scott | 1 |
Carlson, Curt A. | 1 |
Carlson, Maria A. | 1 |
Donkin, Chris | 1 |
Hardy, Sarah C. | 1 |
Heathcote, Andrew | 1 |
Jones, Alyssa R. | 1 |
Kramer, Robin S. S. | 1 |
Lockamyeir, Robert F. | 1 |
Rae, Babette | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 1 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Australia | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Lockamyeir, Robert F.; Carlson, Curt A.; Jones, Alyssa R.; Carlson, Maria A.; Weatherford, Dawn R. – Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2020
The distance from which an eyewitness views a perpetrator is a critical factor for eyewitness identification, but has received little research attention. We presented three mock-crime videos to participants, varying distance to three perpetrators (3, 10, or 20 m). Across two experiments, increased distance reduced empirical discriminability in the…
Descriptors: Visual Discrimination, Accuracy, Identification, Crime
Kramer, Robin S. S.; Hardy, Sarah C.; Ritchie, Kay L. – Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2020
Investigations of face identification have typically focussed on matching faces to photographic IDs. Few researchers have considered the task of searching for a face in a crowd. In Experiment 1, we created the Chokepoint Search Test to simulate real-time search for a target. Performance on this test was poor (39% accuracy) and showed moderate…
Descriptors: Identification, Recognition (Psychology), Human Body, Visual Discrimination
Rae, Babette; Heathcote, Andrew; Donkin, Chris; Averell, Lee; Brown, Scott – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2014
Decision-makers effortlessly balance the need for urgency against the need for caution. Theoretical and neurophysiological accounts have explained this tradeoff solely in terms of the "quantity" of evidence required to trigger a decision (the "threshold"). This explanation has also been used as a benchmark test for evaluating…
Descriptors: Decision Making Skills, Reaction Time, Evidence, Accuracy