Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Redundancy | 3 |
Change Strategies | 2 |
Statistical Analysis | 2 |
Academic Advising | 1 |
Accuracy | 1 |
Action Research | 1 |
Administrator Education | 1 |
Ambiguity (Context) | 1 |
Barriers | 1 |
Best Practices | 1 |
College Faculty | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Forest Fisher | 1 |
Gentry, Debra | 1 |
Hertwig, Ralph | 1 |
Herzog, Stefan M. | 1 |
Nate Mickleson | 1 |
Roberts, Jalynn | 1 |
Tara Bahl | 1 |
Townsend, Amy | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Tests/Questionnaires | 3 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 3 |
Postsecondary Education | 3 |
Two Year Colleges | 1 |
Audience
Location
Mississippi | 1 |
Switzerland | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Forest Fisher; Tara Bahl; Nate Mickleson – Research & Practice in Assessment, 2023
This article describes a faculty-led project to assess and revise institutional student learning outcomes at a small urban community college. The revision process involved four stages: (1) exploring stakeholders' explicit and implicit understandings through an experimental assessment; (2) using statistical tools to identify redundancies and…
Descriptors: Urban Areas, Community Colleges, College Faculty, Outcome Based Education
Herzog, Stefan M.; Hertwig, Ralph – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2014
Individuals can partly recreate the "wisdom of crowds" within their own minds by combining nonredundant estimates they themselves have generated. Herzog and Hertwig (2009) showed that this accuracy gain could be boosted by urging people to actively think differently when generating a 2nd estimate ("dialectical bootstrapping").…
Descriptors: Sampling, Statistical Inference, Experimental Psychology, Hypothesis Testing
Roberts, Jalynn; Gentry, Debra; Townsend, Amy – Journal of Case Studies in Education, 2011
The purpose of this mixed-method study was to evaluate a Higher Education Administration doctoral program, to understand student perceptions of program quality, to improve both student satisfaction and retention to degree completion, and to plan for the future. Findings from survey data and focus group interviews indicated program strengths to…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Administrator Education, Educational Administration, Mixed Methods Research