NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20250
Since 20240
Since 2021 (last 5 years)0
Since 2016 (last 10 years)0
Since 2006 (last 20 years)2
Source
Journal of Educational…3
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing all 3 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Puhan, Gautam; Moses, Timothy P.; Yu, Lei; Dorans, Neil J. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2009
This study examined the extent to which log-linear smoothing could improve the accuracy of differential item functioning (DIF) estimates in small samples of examinees. Examinee responses from a certification test were analyzed using White examinees in the reference group and African American examinees in the focal group. Using a simulation…
Descriptors: Test Items, Reference Groups, Testing Programs, Raw Scores
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Klockars, Alan J.; Lee, Yoonsun – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2008
Monte Carlo simulations with 20,000 replications are reported to estimate the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis regarding DIF using SIBTEST when there is DIF present and/or when impact is present due to differences on the primary dimension to be measured. Sample sizes are varied from 250 to 2000 and test lengths from 10 to 40 items.…
Descriptors: Test Bias, Test Length, Reference Groups, Probability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Clauser, Brian; And Others – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1994
The effect of reducing the number of score groups in the matching criterion of the Mantel-Haenszel procedure when screening for differential item functioning was investigated with a simulated data set. Results suggest that more than modest reductions cannot be recommended when ability distributions of reference and focal groups differ. (SLD)
Descriptors: Ability, Experimental Groups, Item Bias, Reference Groups