Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Publication Type
Reports - Descriptive | 3 |
Legal/Legislative/Regulatory… | 1 |
Opinion Papers | 1 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Secondary Education | 3 |
High Schools | 2 |
Higher Education | 2 |
Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Secondary Education | 2 |
Elementary Education | 1 |
Audience
Policymakers | 1 |
Location
Australia | 2 |
Connecticut | 2 |
New Hampshire | 2 |
New York | 2 |
Rhode Island | 2 |
United Kingdom (England) | 2 |
Vermont | 2 |
Singapore | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Every Student Succeeds Act… | 2 |
Elementary and Secondary… | 1 |
No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
National Assessment of… | 5 |
New York State Regents… | 2 |
Dynamic Indicators of Basic… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Darling-Hammond, Linda – Learning Policy Institute, 2017
After passage of the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) in 2015, states assumed greater responsibility for designing their own accountability and assessment systems. ESSA requires states to measure "higher order thinking skills and understanding" and encourages the use of open-ended performance assessments, which are essential for…
Descriptors: Performance Based Assessment, Accountability, Portfolios (Background Materials), Task Analysis
Darling-Hammond, Linda – Council of Chief State School Officers, 2017
The Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) opened up new possibilities for how student and school success are defined and supported in American public education. States have greater responsibility for designing and building their assessment and accountability systems. These new opportunities to develop performance assessments are critically important…
Descriptors: Performance Based Assessment, Accountability, Portfolios (Background Materials), Task Analysis
Polikoff, Morgan S. – Center for American Progress, 2014
The Common Core State Standards (CCSS) were created in response to the shortcomings of No Child Left Behind era standards and assessments. Among those failings were the poor quality of content standards and assessments and the variability in content expectations and proficiency targets across states, as well as concerns related to the economic…
Descriptors: Common Core State Standards, Educational Legislation, Federal Legislation, Elementary Secondary Education
Chelimsky, Eleanor – 1992
This letter is an interim response to the October 7, 1991 request from the Committee on Education and Labor and the Subcommittee on Elementary, Secondary, and Vocational Education of the House of Representatives asking for a review of the National Assessment Governing Board (NAGB) achievement levels for the National Assessment of Educational…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Academic Standards, Data Analysis, Government Role
National Academy of Education, Washington, DC. – 1991
In 1988, whether the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)--the "Nation's Report Card"--could become a report card for the states was studied. A trial assessment program was authorized to determine whether state assessments following the NAEP format could produce reliable and useful estimates of educational progress. This…
Descriptors: Cost Effectiveness, Data Collection, Educational Assessment, Educational Policy