Publication Date
| In 2025 | 1 |
| Since 2024 | 1 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Artificial Intelligence | 1 |
| College Faculty | 1 |
| Comparative Testing | 1 |
| Computer Assisted Testing | 1 |
| Error of Measurement | 1 |
| Ethics | 1 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| Grading | 1 |
| Interrater Reliability | 1 |
| Reliability | 1 |
| Scoring | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Jonas Flodén | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkJonas Flodén – British Educational Research Journal, 2025
This study compares how the generative AI (GenAI) large language model (LLM) ChatGPT performs in grading university exams compared to human teachers. Aspects investigated include consistency, large discrepancies and length of answer. Implications for higher education, including the role of teachers and ethics, are also discussed. Three…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Artificial Intelligence, Comparative Testing, Scoring
