NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20260
Since 20250
Since 2022 (last 5 years)0
Since 2017 (last 10 years)4
Since 2007 (last 20 years)9
Showing 1 to 15 of 120 results Save | Export
Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education, 2021
Since the onset of the COVID-19 crisis, public colleges and universities have prioritized the health and safety of students, faculty, staff and visitors while continuing to offer an exceptional, affordable learning environment. Public higher education has been agile and responsive. In March 2020, the state system institutions transitioned more…
Descriptors: State Colleges, State Universities, Undergraduate Students, Paying for College
Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education, 2020
COVID-19 and the response to the pandemic in Oklahoma and the nation mark this as an unprecedented time in American history. Oklahoma's state system of higher education has responded to the challenges created with flexibility and innovation, transitioning more than 173,000 students to virtual, online, and alternative course delivery formats for…
Descriptors: Colleges, Universities, Paying for College, Undergraduate Students
Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education, 2019
The Oklahoma State Regents remain completely committed to maintaining the accessibility and affordability of public higher education for all Oklahomans and increasing the number of college graduates to provide the educated workforce our state requires to be competitive in a dynamic, global economy. This annual report reflects the significant…
Descriptors: Colleges, Universities, Paying for College, Undergraduate Students
Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education, 2018
Higher education is the state's road to jobs and prosperity. No entity in state government can help Oklahoma reach its goals of educational excellence and workforce development faster or more comprehensively than public higher education. More college graduates means an increase in our state's per capita income and a stronger state economy. This…
Descriptors: Colleges, Universities, Paying for College, Undergraduate Students
Shearouse, Randy – ProQuest LLC, 2012
Over half of the states now require students to pass a high stakes exit exam before being allowed to graduate from high school. No Child Left Behind requires that standardized testing be included to determine whether or not a school makes Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). The purpose of this study is to examine the results of the Georgia High School…
Descriptors: Exit Examinations, Graduation, Educational Legislation, Federal Legislation
Amos, Jason, Ed. – Alliance for Excellent Education, 2011
"Straight A's: Public Education Policy and Progress" is a biweekly newsletter that focuses on education news and events both in Washington, DC and around the country. The following articles are included in this issue: (1) On Anniversary of "Brown Versus Board of Education," Providing True Educational Equality for All Students…
Descriptors: Equal Education, Dropouts, Federal Aid, Politics of Education
Weiss, Michael J.; Visher, Mary; Weissman, Evan – Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2012
Community college stakeholders are searching with increasing urgency for approaches with the potential to improve the success rates for community college students, particularly those in need of developmental education. "Learning communities," which place cohorts of students together in two or more courses for one semester, are a popular…
Descriptors: Outcomes of Education, Community Colleges, Educational Objectives, Developmental Studies Programs
Allington, Richard L. – Learning, 1987
More than five years of research offers little evidence that students who attend federally funded remedial and learning disabled reading programs improve their reading skills. The three assumptions underlying these programs are discussed. Ways teachers and schools can evaluate their programs are listed. (MT)
Descriptors: Elementary Education, Federal Programs, Learning Disabilities, Program Effectiveness
Schwartz, Ronald – Nation's Schools, 1971
Discusses the current state of the Right to Read Program and outlines future developments. (JF)
Descriptors: Adult Literacy, Federal Programs, Illiteracy, Individualized Programs
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Meeks, Jane Warren – Reading Horizons, 1982
Concludes that Title I has suffered from a politically bad image that might be due in part to unrealistic expectations. (FL)
Descriptors: Educationally Disadvantaged, Elementary Secondary Education, Federal Programs, Program Evaluation
Casey, Rhoda Lintz – 1974
When applying for federal funding of an academic project, the writing of the proposal is important and should include a description of the institution and its population, a statement of the problem to be alleviated, an outline of the proposed attack on the problem, a specific catalog of each necessary item, and an itemized statement of the…
Descriptors: Community Colleges, Federal Aid, Federal Programs, Financial Support
National Center for Educational Communication (DHEW/OE), Washington, DC. – 1972
The Learning to Learn Program was designed to help children acquire the abilities for dealing with challenges and problems. The program provides a unique preschool experience for disadvantaged children. The Learning to Learn curriculum has maintained its original characteristics throughout the years and is designed to help children develop…
Descriptors: Compensatory Education, Discovery Learning, Educationally Disadvantaged, Federal Programs
Allen, Gary G. – Phi Delta Kappan, 1971
The Federal-State-local, public-private right to read effort is evaluated by the former acting director of the Right to Read National Reading Center. (JF)
Descriptors: Basic Reading, Federal Programs, Illiteracy, Reading Comprehension
Phi Delta Kappan, 1971
The new director of the Right to Read Program answers criticisms of that program by its former director. (JF)
Descriptors: Basic Reading, Federal Programs, Illiteracy, Reading Comprehension
Anderson, Lorin W.; Pellicer, Leonard O. – American School Board Journal, 1993
South Carolina has found that meaningful improvement in Chapter 1 schools requires taking six crucial steps: (1) set meaningful goals; (2) pay attention to school culture; (3) revamp the curriculum; (4) pick up the pace; (5) integrate learning objectives with the regular program; and (6) change teaching tactics. An insert summarizes changes…
Descriptors: Compensatory Education, Elementary Secondary Education, Federal Programs, Program Effectiveness
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8