Publication Date
| In 2025 | 1 |
| Since 2024 | 1 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Biological Sciences | 1 |
| Boards of Education | 1 |
| Ethics | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| Group Dynamics | 1 |
| Humanities | 1 |
| Integrity | 1 |
| Natural Sciences | 1 |
| Participative Decision Making | 1 |
| Research | 1 |
| Research Committees | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Journal of Academic Ethics | 1 |
Author
| A. Cekanauskaite | 1 |
| E. Gefenas | 1 |
| E. Löfström | 1 |
| H. Pitkänen | 1 |
| S. Kyllönen | 1 |
| V. Lukaševiciene | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
| Europe | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkE. Löfström; H. Pitkänen; A. Cekanauskaite; V. Lukaševiciene; S. Kyllönen; E. Gefenas – Journal of Academic Ethics, 2025
This research focuses on how research ethics committee and integrity board members discuss and decide on solutions to case scenarios that involve a dimension of research ethics or integrity in collaborative settings. The cases involved issues around authorship, conflict of interest, disregard of good scientific practice and ethics review, and…
Descriptors: Research, Ethics, Integrity, Boards of Education
