NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20253
Since 202414
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing all 14 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Karlo Ložnjak; Anamaria Maleševic; Marin Cargo; Anamarija Mladinic; Zvonimir Koporc; Livia Puljak – Journal of Academic Ethics, 2024
Personal data protection is an ethical issue. In this study we analyzed how research ethics committees (RECs) and data protection officers (DPOs) handle personal data protection issues in research protocols. We conducted a mixed-methods study. We included heads (or delegated representatives) of RECs and DPOs from universities and public research…
Descriptors: Research Committees, Ethics, Information Security, Foreign Countries
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Sarah Potthoff; Fee Roth; Matthé Scholten – Research Ethics, 2024
This study explores how qualitative health researchers navigate the demands of medical research ethics committees in Germany where qualitative research is subject to approval only when it is conducted in medical contexts. We present the results of a grounded theory study to investigate qualitative health researchers' experiences with procedural…
Descriptors: Medical Research, Health, Qualitative Research, Ethics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Aidan C. Tan; Angela C. Webster; Sol Libesman; Zijing Yang; Rani R. Chand; Weber Liu; Talia Palacios; Kylie E. Hunter; Anna Lene Seidler – Research Synthesis Methods, 2024
Background: Data sharing improves the value, synthesis, and integrity of research, but rates are low. Data sharing might be improved if data sharing policies were prominent and actionable at every stage of research. We aimed to systematically describe the epidemiology of data sharing policies across the health research lifecycle. Methods: This was…
Descriptors: Information Dissemination, Data, Health, Medical Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hugo Boothby – Research Ethics, 2024
In 2019, a new national Ethics Review Authority (Etikprövningsmyndigheten, EPM) was created in Sweden. In 2020, Sweden's "Ethical Review of Research Involving Humans Act" was revised, tightening this legislation, and increasing penalties for its infraction. This article draws on empirical material generated by artistic research conducted…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Musicians, Disabilities, Legislation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Sarven S. McLinton; Sarah N. Menz; Bernard Guerin; Elspeth McInnes – Journal of Academic Ethics, 2024
Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) reviewers often provide similar feedback across applications, which suggests that the problem lies in researcher awareness of key issues rather than novel, unsolvable challenges. If common problems can be addressed before lodgement by applicants referencing clear evidence-based supports (e.g., FAQs on common…
Descriptors: Ethics, Informed Consent, Research Committees, Research Methodology
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Angela Henderson; John Cassidy; Abigail Croydon; Melanie Nind – British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2024
Background: Inclusive research is widely accepted as an essential part of the process to democratise knowledge creation and dissemination. However, while peer review is an important part of academic publishing, the potential to include people with learning disabilities in this element of the research process has not previously been explored using…
Descriptors: Learning Disabilities, Adults, Peer Evaluation, Inclusion
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
E. Löfström; H. Pitkänen; A. Cekanauskaite; V. Lukaševiciene; S. Kyllönen; E. Gefenas – Journal of Academic Ethics, 2025
This research focuses on how research ethics committee and integrity board members discuss and decide on solutions to case scenarios that involve a dimension of research ethics or integrity in collaborative settings. The cases involved issues around authorship, conflict of interest, disregard of good scientific practice and ethics review, and…
Descriptors: Research, Ethics, Integrity, Boards of Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Abukari Kwame; Pammla M. Petrucka – Journal of Academic Ethics, 2024
Gaining ethical approval for qualitative health research and implementing all the planned research processes in a proposed study are not straightforward endeavours. The situation becomes more complex when qualitative research is conducted in a cross-national healthcare and academic context. Also, it is even exhausting when the study is…
Descriptors: Ethics, Doctoral Students, Student Research, Informed Consent
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Gillian Houston; Ingrid Lunt – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2024
In recent decades the doctorate and its purposes have undergone fundamental change. The scholarly model has evolved from one of 'apprentice' to independent, supported learner and the doctoral training process has been revolutionised; many candidates now experience cohort-based, structured research. The UK's final PhD examination, however, has…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Doctoral Degrees, Doctoral Dissertations, Degree Requirements
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jiale Xie; Denise Stockley; Amber Hastings Truelove; Susan Marlin; Rachel Zand; Jennifer Payne; Miranda Miller; Eleftherios Soleas – Research Ethics, 2024
Despite advancements in human research ethics and the growing significance of Research Ethics Board (REB) members, educational opportunities specifically tailored to their needs remain lacking in many countries. In response to this gap, our research aims to understand the demographics, needs, and preferences for educational opportunities of REB…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Ethics, Governing Boards, Research and Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ellen Taylor-Bower; Kate Plaisted-Grant; Stephanie Archer – Educational Action Research, 2025
Drawing upon ongoing research exploring lived experiences of sensory overload, meltdown, and shutdown in autism as a framework, this article reflects on the challenges and benefits of employing participatory methods in doctoral research. In particular, the process of establishing and working with a Research Advisory Group to co-create a…
Descriptors: Autism Spectrum Disorders, Participatory Research, Research Design, Research Methodology
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Theresa Burgess; Stuart Rennie; Keymanthri Moodley – Research Ethics, 2024
South African research ethics committees (RECs) faced significant challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic. Research ethics committees needed to find a balance between careful consideration of scientific validity and ethical merit of protocols, and review with the urgency normally associated with public health emergency research. We aimed to…
Descriptors: Research Committees, Ethics, Foreign Countries, COVID-19
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Michelle Frierson; Victoria Hand; Elizabeth Mendoza; Jihee Yoon – AERA Open, 2024
Collaborations between education stakeholders are increasingly prevalent due to the need for diverse perspectives on issues of justice in education. Less is known, however, about how stakeholders form heterogeneous communities where people from different backgrounds learn and take action together. This study examined the contours of a community…
Descriptors: Partnerships in Education, Community Involvement, Stakeholders, Communities of Practice
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kate Stephens; Emma Sciberras; Matthew Bisset; Ainsley Summerton; David Coghill; Christel M. Middeldorp; Leanne Payne; Mark A. Bellgrove; Stephen V. Faraone; Tobias Banaschewski; Jeffery H. Newcorn; Stacey D. Espinet; Iris Manor; Mohammed M. J. Alqahtani; Jeremy Varnham; Timothy J. Silk – Journal of Attention Disorders, 2025
Objectives: To determine ADHD research priorities from the perspective of ADHD professionals internationally. Method: A two-stage modified Delphi design was used. In Stage 1 (qualitative), participants listed research questions relating to ADHD that they perceived to be most important (N = 132). In Stage 2 (quantitative), participants were then…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Global Approach, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, Research and Development