NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 9 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Anderson, Joe – Higher Education, 1994
Foresight analysis is proposed as an alternative to strategic planning in the scientific community, and its use by individual funding agencies to develop research resource allocation strategies for specific scientific fields is explored through an analysis in the field of cardiovascular research. Methodology is explained, and preliminary results…
Descriptors: Cardiovascular System, Foreign Countries, Higher Education, Medical Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Rip, Arie – Higher Education, 1994
Analysis of the role of research councils and the awarding of research grants suggests that they have become part of the reward system of the scientific community. It is proposed that research councils must become entrepreneurial, seeking both resources and a role in strategic networks, or face obsolescence. (MSE)
Descriptors: Agency Role, Economic Climate, Educational Change, Entrepreneurship
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hanson, Robert – Higher Education, 1994
Funding practices of Canada's Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council, the principal source of funds for university-based research and scholarship in those disciplines, are examined. In the current competitive environment, the council uses varied evaluation activities, from peer-based grant adjudication for operational purposes to program…
Descriptors: Agency Role, Competition, Decision Making, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Slatyer, Ralph O. – Higher Education, 1994
Australia's Cooperative Research Centres Program, a system of 52 research and development (R&D) units, links researchers from public and private sectors, helping industry and scientific community coordinate research efforts. The program represents 6% of the national R&D effort and spans six major R&D and industry sectors. (MSE)
Descriptors: Agency Role, Decision Making, Federal Aid, Foreign Countries
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
McCloskey, Ian – Higher Education, 1994
The role of Australia's National Health and Medical Research Council, an independent statutory body, in distribution of funds for research projects, programs, units, and major institutes. The agency's evaluation system, resource allocation practices, and training and career support system are described briefly. (MSE)
Descriptors: Administrative Policy, Agency Role, Conflict of Interest, Decision Making
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
McCullough, James – Higher Education, 1994
The National Science Foundation practice of using scientifically qualified program directors, some from university laboratories, to make grant-giving recommendations independent of external peer reviewers is compared with the practice of other agencies. A recent policy of allowing program directors to make some small grants without external peer…
Descriptors: Administrator Qualifications, Administrator Role, Agency Role, Decision Making
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Brennan, Max – Higher Education, 1994
The history of direct government funding of research in Australia's higher education institutions is chronicled, focusing on the evolution of research policy and emphasis on excellence. The establishment of the Australian Research Council and its statement of specific mission and priorities is also detailed. (MSE)
Descriptors: Agency Role, Decision Making, Federal Aid, Federal Government
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hammond, L. S.; Devine, S. D. – Higher Education, 1994
Recent changes in the New Zealand government's research funding system are discussed, and the resulting system is detailed. Remaining structural problems, some of which are seen as constraining progress toward government priorities, are identified and likely solutions and trends indicated. (Author/MSE)
Descriptors: Agency Role, Decision Making, Evaluation Methods, Federal Government
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Van de Kaa, Dirk J. – Higher Education, 1994
It is suggested that, in the Netherlands' system of resource allocation for research, there is subtle and powerful pressure for consensus. Changes in science policy orientation since the 1960s are traced, and the current framework for policy formation, planning, and decision making is sketched. Three peer review models are examined. (MSE)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Conformity, Decision Making, Democratic Values