NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 3 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Wolery, Mark; Dunlap, Glen – Journal of Early Intervention, 2001
This paper describes guidelines for reporting findings from studies using single subject methods, an approach from which early intervention has benefited substantially. Guidelines address: the foundations of the study, what was done to whom under what situations, what the data say, and what the findings mean. (Contains references.) (DB)
Descriptors: Data Collection, Data Interpretation, Disabilities, Early Intervention
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Pedersen, Susan – Journal of Early Intervention, 2003
This article discusses alternative analyses that reflect the practical significance of test results and the role of sample size in the interpretation of results. It explores effect size reporting and using "what if" analyses to reflect on the role of sample size in the decision to accept the null hypothesis. (Contains references.) (Author/CR)
Descriptors: Data Interpretation, Disabilities, Early Childhood Education, Educational Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Brotherson, Mary Jane – Journal of Early Intervention, 1999
This commentary on a previous article that demonstrates three ways of analyzing qualitative interview data (content, cultural models, and narrative analyses), discusses the need for greater articulation of the complexities of interpretation and a greater emphasis on verification procedures in early intervention qualitative research. (CR)
Descriptors: Cultural Awareness, Cultural Differences, Data Interpretation, Disabilities