NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 7 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Braverman, Marc T. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2013
Sound evaluation planning requires numerous decisions about how constructs in a program theory will be translated into measures and instruments that produce evaluation data. This article, the first in a dialogue exchange, examines how decisions about measurement are (and should be) made, especially in the context of small-scale local program…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Methods Research, Research Methodology, Research Design
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Azzam, Tarek – American Journal of Evaluation, 2011
This study addresses the central question "How do evaluators' background characteristics relate to their evaluation design choices?" Evaluators were provided with a fictitious description of a school-based program and asked to design an evaluation of that program. Relevant background characteristics such as level of experience,…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Program Evaluation, Evaluation Utilization, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Azzam, Tarek – American Journal of Evaluation, 2010
A simulation study was conducted in an attempt to examine how evaluators modify their evaluation design in response to differing stakeholder groups. In this study, evaluators were provided with a fictitious description of a school-based program. They were then asked to design an evaluation of the program. After the evaluation design decisions were…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Evaluators, Program Evaluation, Simulation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Stufflebeam, Daniel L. – Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, 2011
Good evaluation requires that evaluation efforts themselves be evaluated. Many things can and often do go wrong in evaluation work. Accordingly, it is necessary to check evaluations for problems such as bias, technical error, administrative difficulties, and misuse. Such checks are needed both to improve ongoing evaluation activities and to assess…
Descriptors: Program Evaluation, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Definitions
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
House, Ernest R. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2008
Drug studies are often cited as the best exemplars of evaluation design. However, many of these studies are seriously biased in favor of positive findings for the drugs evaluated, even to the point where dangerous effects are hidden. In spite of using randomized designs and double blinding, drug companies have found ways of producing the results…
Descriptors: Integrity, Evaluation Methods, Program Evaluation, Experimenter Characteristics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Conner, Ross F. – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1985
The author compares his experiences evaluating Peace Corps volunteers in Kenya and evaluating a health promotion program for adolescents in Orange County, California. Doing international evaluations can improve domestic evaluations by heightening awareness of often unrecognized cultural variations in the domestic setting. (BS)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Cultural Awareness, Evaluation Methods, Experimenter Characteristics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Newes, Sandra L. – Journal of Experiential Education, 2001
More methodologically sound research in adventure therapy is needed if the field is to claim empirically-based efficacy as a treatment modality. Some considerations for conducting outcome studies in adventure therapy relate to standardization, multiple domain assessment, regression techniques, objective assessment of participant change, client and…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Experimenter Characteristics, Outcomes of Treatment, Program Evaluation