NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Steiner, Peter M.; Wong, Vivian – Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2016
Despite recent emphasis on the use of randomized control trials (RCTs) for evaluating education interventions, in most areas of education research, observational methods remain the dominant approach for assessing program effects. Over the last three decades, the within-study comparison (WSC) design has emerged as a method for evaluating the…
Descriptors: Randomized Controlled Trials, Comparative Analysis, Research Design, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Keller, Bryan S. B.; Kim, Jee-Seon; Steiner, Peter M. – Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2013
Propensity score analysis (PSA) is a methodological technique which may correct for selection bias in a quasi-experiment by modeling the selection process using observed covariates. Because logistic regression is well understood by researchers in a variety of fields and easy to implement in a number of popular software packages, it has…
Descriptors: Probability, Scores, Statistical Analysis, Statistical Bias
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wong, Manyee; Cook, Thomas D.; Steiner, Peter M. – Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2015
Some form of a short interrupted time series (ITS) is often used to evaluate state and national programs. An ITS design with a single treatment group assumes that the pretest functional form can be validly estimated and extrapolated into the postintervention period where it provides a valid counterfactual. This assumption is problematic. Ambiguous…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Time, Federal Legislation, Educational Legislation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Cook, Thomas D.; Steiner, Peter M. – Psychological Methods, 2010
In this article, we note the many ontological, epistemological, and methodological similarities between how Campbell and Rubin conceptualize causation. We then explore 3 differences in their written emphases about individual case matching in observational studies. We contend that (a) Campbell places greater emphasis than Rubin on the special role…
Descriptors: Research Methodology, Pretests Posttests, Data Analysis, Evaluation Methods