Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Mail Surveys | 3 |
Program Implementation | 3 |
Research Methodology | 3 |
Intervention | 2 |
Administrator Attitudes | 1 |
Barriers | 1 |
Comparative Analysis | 1 |
Disabilities | 1 |
Disability Identification | 1 |
Educational Practices | 1 |
Electronic Mail | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Carpenter, Ellen | 1 |
Chereji, Elizabeth | 1 |
Hilt, Lori M. | 1 |
Kazdin, Alan E. | 1 |
Lambert, Monica | 1 |
Perepletchikova, Francheska | 1 |
Thach, Liz | 1 |
Werts, Margaret Gessler | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Adult Education | 2 |
Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
North Carolina | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Perepletchikova, Francheska; Hilt, Lori M.; Chereji, Elizabeth; Kazdin, Alan E. – Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 2009
Treatment integrity refers to implementing interventions as intended. Treatment integrity is critically important for experimental validity and for drawing valid inferences regarding the relationship between treatment and outcome. Yet, it is rarely adequately addressed in psychotherapy research. The authors examined barriers to treatment integrity…
Descriptors: Outcomes of Treatment, Validity, Integrity, Psychotherapy
Werts, Margaret Gessler; Lambert, Monica; Carpenter, Ellen – Learning Disability Quarterly, 2009
An e-mail survey of special education directors was conducted to ascertain practices related to implementation of Response to Intervention (RTI) processes in North Carolina schools. The data indicate that special education directors have information about RTI as a method of identifying students with disabilities, but there is little consensus on…
Descriptors: Disabilities, Mail Surveys, Special Education, Program Implementation
Thach, Liz – Educational Technology, 1995
Describes public and private online networks and the characteristics of electronic mail. Reviews the literature on survey research conducted via electronic mail, and examines the issues of design, implementation, and response. A table displays advantages and disadvantages of electronic mail surveys. (AEF)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Electronic Mail, Information Networks, Literature Reviews