Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 1 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Medical Research | 2 |
Randomized Controlled Trials | 2 |
Research Methodology | 2 |
Research Problems | 2 |
COVID-19 | 1 |
Classification | 1 |
Comparative Analysis | 1 |
Delphi Technique | 1 |
Epidemiology | 1 |
Ethics | 1 |
Evidence | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Clayton, Gemma L. | 1 |
Emma Law | 1 |
Higgins, Julian PT | 1 |
Hróbjartsson, Asbjørn | 1 |
Isabel Smith | 1 |
Jones, Hayley E. | 1 |
Moustgaard, Helene | 1 |
Savovic, Jelena | 1 |
Sterne, Jonathan AC | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 2 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Emma Law; Isabel Smith – Research Ethics, 2024
During the COVID-19 pandemic, the race to find an effective vaccine or treatment saw an 'extraordinary number' of clinical trials being conducted. While there were some key success stories, not all trials produced results that informed patient care. There was a significant amount of waste in clinical research during the pandemic which is said to…
Descriptors: Ethics, Research Methodology, Integrity, COVID-19
Moustgaard, Helene; Jones, Hayley E.; Savovic, Jelena; Clayton, Gemma L.; Sterne, Jonathan AC; Higgins, Julian PT; Hróbjartsson, Asbjørn – Research Synthesis Methods, 2020
Randomized clinical trials underpin evidence-based clinical practice, but flaws in their conduct may lead to biased estimates of intervention effects and hence invalid treatment recommendations. The main approach to the empirical study of bias is to collate a number of meta-analyses and, within each, compare the results of trials with and without…
Descriptors: Epidemiology, Evidence, Medical Research, Intervention