NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Sørensen, Ole Henning; Bjørner, Jakob; Holtermann, Andreas; Dyreborg, Johnny; Sørli, Jorid Birkelund; Kristiansen, Jesper; Nielsen, Steffen Bohni – Research Evaluation, 2022
Research funders and policymakers increasingly focus on societal benefits of their investments in research. Research institutions thus face increasing pressure to demonstrate their societal impact to prove their legitimacy and worth. To this end, research institutions need reliable, quantitative methods to measure societal impact. This article…
Descriptors: Test Construction, Test Validity, Statistical Analysis, Outcome Measures
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Kaplan, Frances F. – Art Therapy: Journal of the American Art Therapy Association, 2001
Examines the tension between the particular and the general in art therapy and makes a case that the art therapist's concern with particularity does not obviate the need for research in the field. Consideration is given to two frequent stumbling blocks for beginning researchers: the use of statistics and the possibility of obtaining negative…
Descriptors: Art Therapy, Inquiry, Research and Development, Research Needs
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Freedman, Elaine S. – System, 1986
Presents a brief overview of good research design and related statistical concepts in deliberately non-technical language and argues that an awareness of the basic principles of valid research on the part of teachers and researchers is necessary to put the findings of language and education research into proper perspective. (Author/CB)
Descriptors: Language Research, Language Teachers, Qualitative Research, Research and Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Kostoff, Ronald N. – Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1994
Describes the practice of federal evaluation of research impact through three approaches: retrospective methods; qualitative methods, including peer review; and quantitative methods. Recommended areas for study in federal research impact assessment are suggested, including predictive reliability, comparative studies, time and cost estimates,…
Descriptors: Bibliometrics, Comparative Analysis, Costs, Evaluation Methods