Descriptor
| Abstract Reasoning | 1 |
| Cognitive Processes | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Logical Thinking | 1 |
| Mathematical Formulas | 1 |
| Prediction | 1 |
| Probability | 1 |
| Reliability | 1 |
| Research Problems | 1 |
| Research Reviews… | 1 |
| Sampling | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Cognition | 1 |
Author
| Cohen, L. Jonathan | 1 |
Publication Type
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedCohen, L. Jonathan – Cognition, 1979
Until recently, norms of experimental reasoning have lacked systematic theoretical development. Thus, it has been easy for psychologists like Tversky and Kahneman to misclassify certain human reasoning processes as being Pascalian and invalid, rather than as being Baconian and valid. (CP)
Descriptors: Abstract Reasoning, Cognitive Processes, Higher Education, Logical Thinking
