Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Reaction Time | 10 |
Research Methodology | 10 |
Research Problems | 10 |
Response Style (Tests) | 4 |
Higher Education | 3 |
Individual Differences | 3 |
Intelligence Quotient | 3 |
College Students | 2 |
Intelligence | 2 |
Intelligence Tests | 2 |
Models | 2 |
More ▼ |
Author
Longstreth, Langdon E. | 2 |
Vernon, Philip A. | 2 |
Craig, S. Bartholomew | 1 |
DeBord, Larry W. | 1 |
Glass, Arnold L. | 1 |
Jensen, Arthur R. | 1 |
Kiger, John I. | 1 |
Larson, Gerald E. | 1 |
Meade, Adam W. | 1 |
Queen, John E. | 1 |
Rusting, Jean | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 9 |
Reports - Research | 4 |
Opinion Papers | 3 |
Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Information Analyses | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Armed Services Vocational… | 1 |
Raven Advanced Progressive… | 1 |
Wechsler Adult Intelligence… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Meade, Adam W.; Craig, S. Bartholomew – Psychological Methods, 2012
When data are collected via anonymous Internet surveys, particularly under conditions of obligatory participation (such as with student samples), data quality can be a concern. However, little guidance exists in the published literature regarding techniques for detecting careless responses. Previously several potential approaches have been…
Descriptors: Online Surveys, Data Collection, Research Problems, Identification

Longstreth, Langdon E. – Intelligence, 1984
Jensen has reported reaction-time (RT) studies indicating that various parameters correlate significantly with IQ. Two parameters of interest are slope of RT across set size and increasing correlations of RT with IQ as set size increases. After reviewing these studies, the author concludes that Jensen's claims are unwarranted. (Author/BW)
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Intelligence, Reaction Time, Research Methodology

Longstreth, Langdon E. – Intelligence, 1986
The author replies to Jensen and Vernon's article and maintains that there is little reason for accepting Jensen's claims, particularly with respect to the major theoretical question. (Author/LMO)
Descriptors: Individual Differences, Intelligence Quotient, Reaction Time, Research Methodology

Vernon, Philip A. – Intelligence, 1986
Ruchalla, Schalt, and Vogel (1985) reported a negative correlation between the g-loadness of intelligence subtests and the extent to which the subtests correlated with reaction times. Possible methodological problems with Ruchalla et al. are described, and results of two other studies pertinent to the issue are discussed. (Author/LMO)
Descriptors: College Students, Correlation, Higher Education, Intelligence Tests

Kiger, John I.; Glass, Arnold L. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1981
Three experiments examined what happens to reaction time to verify easy items when they are mixed with difficult items in a verification task. Subjects verification of simple arithmetic equations and sentences took longer when placed in a difficult list. Difficult sentences also slowed the verification of easy arithmetic equations. (Author/RD)
Descriptors: Context Clues, Decision Making, Higher Education, Models

DeBord, Larry W. – Community/Junior College Research Quarterly, 1979
A study of the factors influencing response rates in survey research--including kind of instrument used and personality and job characteristics of those surveyed--examined response rates to a mailed questionnaire in a sample of vocational-technical teachers and their program directors. Offers suggestions on improving response rates in…
Descriptors: Educational Research, Questionnaires, Reaction Time, Research Methodology

Larson, Gerald E.; Saccuzzo, Dennis P. – Intelligence, 1986
This paper examines Longstreth's criticisms of Jensen's studies relating reaction-time to measures of intelligence and finds them unconvincing. While Longstreth raises some interesting questions, the authors found no evidence in the data for practice or order effects in a reaction-time paradigm. (BS)
Descriptors: Attention, College Students, Higher Education, Intelligence

Welford, A. T. – Intelligence, 1986
Four points are made in regard to the controversial reaction times studies: (1) apparatus used is not the best; (2) practice effects have not been thoroughly accounted for; (3) there is some evidence that simple reactions are different from choice ones; and (4) basic data to be explained are those which show substantial group differences.…
Descriptors: Group Testing, Individual Differences, Intelligence Quotient, Intelligence Tests

Jensen, Arthur R.; Vernon, Philip A. – Intelligence, 1986
Longstreth's critique of Jensen's research on the relationship of IQ to individual differences in visual reaction time (RT), measured in the Hick paradigm, is said to have numerous errors of fact and interpretation, some trivial and some of theoretical importance. (Author/LMO)
Descriptors: Individual Differences, Intelligence Quotient, Meta Analysis, Models

Queen, John E.; Rusting, Jean – 1977
Questionnaires were mailed to a sample of 1,980 non-returning, non-occupational students who had been enrolled at Cerritos College during spring 1976 but did not return in fall 1976, in order to test the applicability of the California community college Student Accountability Model (SAM), a statewide follow-up system for occupational students, to…
Descriptors: Academic Education, Community Colleges, Dropouts, Educational Objectives