NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 10 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Teague, Gerald V.; Heathington, Betty S. – Journal of the Society of Research Administrators, 1979
A study was undertaken to gather precise data regarding the expenses incurred in the preparation of proposals submitted within a specified time period by an academic unit within an institution of higher education and to compare those costs to the success (funding) of the proposals. The results indicate a return to the institution of over ten times…
Descriptors: Contracts, Cost Effectiveness, Costs, Financial Support
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Latimer, Dewitt A.; McCracken, Alden L. – Journal of the Society of Research Administrators, 1988
Office automation technology is being used to process proposals at Clemson University. The Electronic Proposal Submittal project is a process by which the Principal Investigator can create a proposal at his or her local station and electronically submit it for processing. (Author/MLW)
Descriptors: Futures (of Society), Grantsmanship, Higher Education, Minicomputers
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Heathington, Betty S.; And Others – Journal of the Society of Research Administrators, 1982
Ways in which the beginning research administrator can assist faculty in understanding the review process and in using the information to enhance the chances of successfully competing for federal funds are described. (Author/MLW)
Descriptors: Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Federal Aid, Financial Support
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Heathington, Betty S.; Teague, Gerald V. – Journal of the Society of Research Administrators, 1980
A survey of rejected applicants for federal grants revealed that while most of them secured feedback from agencies regarding the disapproval, many were concerned about the value of such information. Follow-up and program modifications can result only when effective interaction is achieved. (MLW)
Descriptors: Evaluation, Federal Aid, Feedback, Financial Aid Applicants
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Jebens, Arthur B. – Journal of the Society of Research Administrators, 1976
Determination of the impact of Federal agency requirements was the objective of a study conducted as part of the University of California Research Management Improvement Project. Specific recommendations for administrators are offered. For journal availability see HE 509 147. (LBH)
Descriptors: Bids, Contracts, Federal Government, Government School Relationship
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Harris, Kathleen – Journal of the Society of Research Administrators, 1985
Interviews with faculty on decisions to submit proposals for external funding suggest that activity at the current institution is related to previous experience, and more experience in graduate school may have a strong, positive effect on later activity. (Author/MSE)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Decision Making, Grantsmanship, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Askin, Jacalyn Ann; Askin, Ronald G. – Journal of the Society of Research Administrators, 1981
Various aspects of the costs of research are examined including: cost-sharing, indirect cost items, costs of proposal preparation, costs of research-academicians turned government-researchers and research-administrators. Budget items of a typical grant award are reviewed to determine which elements may be considered pay-off. (MLW)
Descriptors: Budgeting, Budgets, Costs, Federal Aid
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Nachby, Andrew L. – Journal of the Society of Research Administrators, 1979
A research administrator is seen as one who provides an environment conducive to the performance of research by allowing the principal investigator to spend as little time as possible with administrative paperwork. A protocol routing sheet and a checklist for protocol submissions are provided. (MLW)
Descriptors: Administrators, Check Lists, Efficiency, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Rodman, John A.; Peters, Carl M. – Journal of the Society of Research Administrators, 1980
The effective management of the university depends on the research office providing usable, accurate, timely, and accessible information regarding sponsored programs. The utilization of automated systems to store, access, and manage information is seen as essential. (MLW)
Descriptors: Administration, Budgets, Computers, Financial Support
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bender, Carol; Watts-Penny, Kristen – Journal of the Society of Research Administrators, 1987
Diminishing resources have sent colleges and universities searching for innovative ways to increase external funding. Proposal development workshops to increase the number of individuals competent to submit competitive proposals were offered at the University of Oklahoma. Experiences in developing a model program are described. (Author/MLW)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Financial Support, Graduate Students, Higher Education