Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
| Animal Behavior | 3 |
| Animals | 3 |
| Associative Learning | 3 |
| Responses | 3 |
| Conditioning | 2 |
| Experiments | 2 |
| Food | 2 |
| Learning Processes | 2 |
| Reaction Time | 2 |
| Brain Hemisphere Functions | 1 |
| Context Effect | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Chubala, Chrissy M. | 1 |
| Eichenbaum, Howard | 1 |
| Grant, Douglas S. | 1 |
| Johns, Kenneth W. | 1 |
| Komorowski, Robert | 1 |
| Kopell, Nancy | 1 |
| Mather, Amber A. | 1 |
| Tort, Adriano B. L. | 1 |
| Williams, Douglas A. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Research | 3 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkTort, Adriano B. L.; Komorowski, Robert; Kopell, Nancy; Eichenbaum, Howard – Learning & Memory, 2011
The association of specific events with the context in which they occur is a fundamental feature of episodic memory. However, the underlying network mechanisms generating what-where associations are poorly understood. Recently we reported that some hippocampal principal neurons develop representations of specific events occurring in particular…
Descriptors: Animals, Brain Hemisphere Functions, Context Effect, Correlation
Grant, Douglas S. – Learning and Motivation, 2009
To test the hypothesis that pigeons will only code the more salient sample when samples differ markedly in salience, pigeons were trained with samples consisting of a 2-s presentation of food (highly salient sample) and an 8-s presentation of keylight (less salient sample). During retention testing, pigeons tended to respond at longer delays as if…
Descriptors: Conditioning, Animals, Animal Behavior, Experiments
Williams, Douglas A.; Chubala, Chrissy M.; Mather, Amber A.; Johns, Kenneth W. – Learning and Motivation, 2009
Appetitive contextual excitation supported by intertrial unconditioned stimuli was more easily overcome by timed conditioned responding in rats using quiet (Experiment 1) rather than noisy (Experiment 2) food pellet deliveries. Head-entry responding in acquisition peaked above the contextual baseline when pellet delivery occurred 10, 30, 60, or 90…
Descriptors: Cues, Intervals, Reaction Time, Food
