Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Revision (Written Composition) | 259 |
Writing Instruction | 186 |
Teaching Methods | 123 |
Writing Processes | 108 |
Higher Education | 98 |
Writing Skills | 71 |
Writing (Composition) | 66 |
Writing Improvement | 61 |
Elementary Secondary Education | 59 |
Prewriting | 57 |
Writing Evaluation | 57 |
More ▼ |
Source
Author
Graham, Steve | 3 |
MacArthur, Charles A. | 3 |
Strickland, James | 3 |
Allen, Jo | 2 |
Balajthy, Ernest | 2 |
Bolte, Anne | 2 |
Collins, Norma Decker | 2 |
Diller, Janelle | 2 |
Fleming, Margaret, Ed. | 2 |
Kurth, Ruth J. | 2 |
McAllister, Carole | 2 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Education Level
Elementary Education | 1 |
Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Practitioners | 259 |
Teachers | 201 |
Researchers | 15 |
Students | 9 |
Administrators | 8 |
Parents | 1 |
Support Staff | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Goals 2000 | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
General Educational… | 4 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 1 |
Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 1 |
Wells, M. Cyrene – Learning, 1987
A teacher shares her technique for improving student writing: add detail. Forget organization, cutting, and adding more information. Get students to focus only on adding more detail to information already included. Examples are given. (MT)
Descriptors: Elementary Education, Revision (Written Composition), Teaching Methods, Writing Improvement

Roundy, Nancy – Journal of Business Communication, 1983
Presents a program for effective revision procedures based on five criteria: amount/kind of detail, appropriate emphasis of content, logical progression, stylistic appropriateness, and mechanical accuracy. (PD)
Descriptors: Higher Education, Revision (Written Composition), Technical Writing, Writing Instruction
Allen, Jo; Southard, Sherry – Technical Writing Teacher, 1987
Recommends that teachers concentrate on explaining explicit procedures for revising style, because many novice writers interpret revision as only proofreading for typing or spelling errors. Provides a set of guidelines for stylistic revision that help students identify problems with passive verbs, nominalizations, wordiness and imprecise language.…
Descriptors: Grammar, Revision (Written Composition), Teaching Methods, Technical Writing
Andrews, Richard – Use of English, 1982
Argues that the use of editing in the classroom involves the students in restructuring, revision, and rethinking as well as correction, extension, and deletion. (HOD)
Descriptors: Assignments, Revision (Written Composition), Secondary Education, Teaching Methods
Schwartz, Alix – 1990
A teacher describes what happens when professional writers are invited into his college composition classroom to talk about and show the processes they employ in revising their work, and reports that students benefit not only by hearing about but also by actually seeing successive drafts. In the class, the students begin the semester by analyzing…
Descriptors: Authors, Classroom Communication, Editing, Higher Education
Kelly, Leonard P.; Nolan, Thomas W. – 1987
Ten deaf college freshmen and a comparison group of five hearing students participated in a study of a method to identify long pauses in written composition that have important statistical properties. Subjects first wrote two initial drafts of short stories they had viewed on video tape. Later, they revised and recopied their two originals and one…
Descriptors: College Students, Deafness, Higher Education, Revision (Written Composition)

Timmons, Theresa Cullen – Teaching English in the Two-Year College, 1987
Indicates that using highlighters to mark errors produced a 76% class improvement in removing comma errors and a 95.5% improvement in removing apostrophe errors. Outlines two teaching procedures, to be followed before introducing this tool to the class, that enable students to remove errors at this effective rate. (JD)
Descriptors: Editing, Instructional Materials, Punctuation, Revision (Written Composition)
Burdman, Debra – Academic Therapy, 1986
The article describes an approach by which word processing helps to solve some of the writing problems of learning disabled students. Aspects considered include prewriting, drafting, revising, and completing the story. (CL)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Learning Disabilities, Prewriting, Revision (Written Composition)

Carroll, Joyce Armstrong – English Journal, 1982
Outlines a procedure to help students revise their writing. (JL)
Descriptors: Revision (Written Composition), Secondary Education, Writing Exercises, Writing Instruction

Reed, Candi Mascia – Perspectives in Education and Deafness, 1995
These guidelines for teaching editing skills to secondary students with hearing impairments focus on: (1) revision, in which students review and refine the content, ideas, and form of their writing; and (2) proofreading and copy editing, in which students examine grammar, sentence structure, punctuation, and spelling. Ways to utilize peers as…
Descriptors: Editing, English, Hearing Impairments, Revision (Written Composition)
Jones, William – 1986
Rather than giving basic writing students handbook and workbook exercises to direct their proofreading, teachers can use a monitoring system that teaches the students to recognize problems and to systematically monitor and eliminate the difficulties. After completing two or three assignments that include several drafts, students copy out all the…
Descriptors: Grammar, Higher Education, Revision (Written Composition), Teaching Methods
Smith, Peggy Foxall – Academic Therapy, 1984
A teacher of secondary learning disabled students describes an effective way of teaching grammar, mechanics, and usage by focusing on revising and editing of the students' own work. (CL)
Descriptors: Grammar, Learning Disabilities, Revision (Written Composition), Secondary Education
King, Mary – 1983
A text's meaning is, in part, independent of its form. Reading, most of the time, is taking meaning--not words--from the printed page, while proofreading requires attention to form rather than meaning. The author notes that: (1) a meaningful passage is easier to read than one with less meaning; (2) errors in oral reading usually do not obscure a…
Descriptors: Language Processing, Reading Comprehension, Revision (Written Composition), Writing Evaluation
Harris, Carol E. – 1986
A study examined whether self-evaluation of writing should precede peer evaluation, and explored effective strategies for peer evaluation of writing. Seventy-six advanced placement English students in a Raleigh, North Carolina, high school were divided into experimental and control groups. The control group participated in peer evaluation of…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, High Schools, Peer Evaluation, Revision (Written Composition)
Strickland, James – 1988
Word processing does not, in itself, teach revision. Students with incomplete revision strategies will not begin revising at a higher level simply by using a word processor. New computer strategies for teaching revision are needed--revision strategies that use the computer to reorganize, elaborate, and strengthen what has already been written. For…
Descriptors: Computer Uses in Education, Higher Education, Revision (Written Composition), Word Processing