NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Audience
Teachers1
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 23 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Renske Bouwer; Chiel van der Veen – Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2024
In this research, we developed and empirically tested a dialogic writing intervention, an integrated language approach in which grade 5/6 students learn how to write, talk about their writing with peers, and rewrite. The effectiveness of this intervention was experimentally tested in ten classes from eight schools, using a pretest-posttest control…
Descriptors: Grade 5, Grade 6, Elementary School Students, Elementary School Teachers
Kristie L. Miner – ProQuest LLC, 2022
Educators play an important role in ensuring that students attain the necessary strategic actions to become skilled writers. Studies have indicated that teachers need to consistently embed a larger range of evidence-based writing practices in their instruction to help their students improve the overall quantity and quality of their writing. The…
Descriptors: Writing Instruction, Writing Strategies, Instructional Effectiveness, Prewriting
Richard Correnti; Lindsay Clare Matsumura; Elaine Lin Wang; Diane Litman; Haoran Zhang – Grantee Submission, 2022
Recent reviews of automated writing evaluation systems indicate lack of uniformity in the purpose, design, and assessment of such systems. Our work lies at the nexus of critical themes arising from these reviews. We describe our work on eRevise, an automated writing evaluation system focused on elementary students' text-based evidence-use. eRevise…
Descriptors: Writing Evaluation, Feedback (Response), Automation, Elementary School Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Afrin, Tazin; Wang, Elaine; Litman, Diane; Matsumura, Lindsay C.; Correnti, Richard – Grantee Submission, 2020
Automated writing evaluation systems can improve students' writing insofar as students attend to the feedback provided and revise their essay drafts in ways aligned with such feedback. Existing research on revision of argumentative writing in such systems, however, has focused on the types of revisions students make (e.g., surface vs. content)…
Descriptors: Writing (Composition), Persuasive Discourse, Revision (Written Composition), Documentation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ailhaud, Emilie; Chenu, Florence; Jisa, Harriet – Journal for the Study of Education and Development, 2021
Revisions in writing aim at text improvement. Literature has shown that revision activity differs between novice and experienced writers. Our ultimate goal is to understand how children and adolescents develop the capacity to shift perspectives from language producer to language recipient -- a prerequisite ability to successful revision. In this…
Descriptors: French, Writing (Composition), Writing Instruction, Foreign Countries
Wang, Elaine Lin; Matsumura, Lindsay Clare; Correnti, Richard; Litman, Diane; Zhang, Haoran; Howe, Emily; Magooda, Ahmed; Quintana, Rafael – Grantee Submission, 2020
We investigate students' implementation of the feedback messages they received in an automated writing evaluation system ("eRevise") that aims to improve students' use of text evidence in their writing. Seven 5th and 6th-grade teachers implemented "eRevise" (n = 143 students). Qualitative analysis of students' essays across…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Writing Evaluation, Computer Software, Grade 5
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Al-Hroub, Anies; Shami, Ghina; Evans, Michael – Language Learning Journal, 2019
The aim of the action research reported here was to examine the differential effects of the 'writers' workshop' approach on the L2 (English) writing skills of upper-primary students with varying writing abilities. The participants were 31 fifth-grade students (17 boys and 14 girls) aged 10-11, who followed L2 English writing instruction based on…
Descriptors: Writing Workshops, Process Approach (Writing), Revision (Written Composition), Writing Improvement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Zhang, H.; Magooda, A.; Litman, D.; Correnti, R.; Wang, E.; Matsumura, L. C.; Howe, E.; Quintana, R. – Grantee Submission, 2019
Writing a good essay typically involves students revising an initial paper draft after receiving feedback. We present eRevise, a web-based writing and revising environment that uses natural language processing features generated for rubric-based essay scoring to trigger formative feedback messages regarding students' use of evidence in…
Descriptors: Formative Evaluation, Essays, Writing (Composition), Revision (Written Composition)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ciullo, Stephen; Mason, Linda – Intervention in School and Clinic, 2017
Helping elementary students with learning disabilities (LD) prepare for the rigor of middle school writing is an instructional priority. Fortunately, several standards-based skills in upper elementary school and middle school overlap. Teachers in upper elementary grades, specifically fourth and fifth grades, have the opportunity to provide…
Descriptors: Writing Instruction, School Readiness, Learning Disabilities, Middle School Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Limpo, Teresa; Alves, Rui A.; Fidalgo, Raquel – British Journal of Educational Psychology, 2014
Background: It is well established that the activity of producing a text is a complex one involving three main cognitive processes: Planning, translating, and revising. Although these processes are crucial in skilled writing, beginning and developing writers seem to struggle with them, mainly with planning and revising. Aims: To trace the…
Descriptors: Writing Skills, Writing Processes, Revision (Written Composition), Planning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Moore, Noreen S.; MacArthur, Charles A. – Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2012
Opportunities to read and analyze others' writing or to observe readers as they analyze writing might enhance one's own sense of audience and improve one's own writing. This mixed-methods study investigated whether reader and observer activities in comparison to writing practice activities affected fifth-grade students' persuasive writing and…
Descriptors: Control Groups, Audience Awareness, Audiences, Grade 5
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Wilson, Joshua; Olinghouse, Natalie G.; Andrada, Gilbert N. – Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 2014
The current study examines data from students in grades 4-8 who participated in a statewide computer-based benchmark writing assessment that featured automated essay scoring and automated feedback. We examined whether the use of automated feedback was associated with gains in writing quality across revisions to an essay, and with transfer effects…
Descriptors: Writing Skills, Writing Ability, Feedback (Response), Computer Mediated Communication
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bedard, Carol; Fuhrken, Charles – Language Arts, 2011
An integrated language arts and technology program engaged students in reading and writing activities that funded an experience in moviemaking. With video cameras in hand, students, often working collaboratively, developed expanded views of the writing and revision processes as they created movies that mattered to them and found an audience beyond…
Descriptors: Video Technology, Language Arts, Reading, Identification
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Crinon, Jacques; Marin, Brigitte – Language Awareness, 2010
French students in grades 4 and 5 in schools around Paris wrote explanatory texts in L1 following a lesson in the Life Sciences, four times over the course of the school year. Each session included written correspondence with another student; half the students (Group G1) made suggestions about ways to improve the drafts of the other half of the…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Biological Sciences, Grade 4, Grade 5
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Crawford, Lindy; Smolkowski, Keith – Assessing Writing, 2008
Students in grades 5 and 8 completed a state writing assessment, and their first and final drafts on the extended writing portion of the test were copied and scored using the state writing rubric. The rubric consisted of three primary traits: Content and Organization, Style and Fluency, and Language Use. Scorers were blind to the study purpose and…
Descriptors: Writing Evaluation, Writing Tests, Grade 8, Grade 5
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2