NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Showing 1 to 15 of 429 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Qi Lu; Yuan Yao; Xinhua Zhu – Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 2024
This study investigates the effects of two aspects of writing revisions (revision amount and revision function) on writing improvement, and how students' self-rating accuracy moderates these effects. Hierarchical linear regression is employed with a sample of 114 undergraduate students. When considering the moderating role of self-rating accuracy,…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Students, Writing (Composition), Revision (Written Composition), Writing Improvement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Han Zhang; Jamie Costley; Matthew Courtney; Galina Shulgina; Mik Fanguy – Education and Information Technologies, 2025
Depending on the nature of comments made during peer review of academic writing, students may be able to evaluate and revise their performance. Therefore, it is essential to explore how the content of comments affects student writing. Since peer review is a process of interaction, it is critical to understand how comments affect student academic…
Descriptors: Graduate Students, Content Area Writing, Academic Language, Feedback (Response)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Salomé Cojean; Manon Grand – British Journal of Educational Psychology, 2024
Background: Taking notes during learning has benefits both during class (through writing things down to encode information) and after class (by using written notes as external storage for revision). Comparisons of note-taking methods (i.e., using paper or a computer) have mainly shown that paper leads to better learning. However, previous studies…
Descriptors: Notetaking, College Students, Preferences, Writing Strategies
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kamali N. Sripathi; Rosa A. Moscarella; Matthew Steele; Rachel Yoho; Hyesun You; Luanna B. Prevost; Mark Urban-Lurain; John Merrill; Kevin C. Haudek – Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2024
Assessing student knowledge based on their writing using traditional qualitative methods is time-consuming. To improve speed and consistency of text analysis, we present our mixed methods development of a machine learning predictive model to analyze student writing. Our approach involves two stages: first an exploratory sequential design, and…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Mixed Methods Research, Student Writing Models, Biology
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ying Zhan – Teaching in Higher Education, 2024
Few studies have explored the difficulties that undergraduates encounter in peer assessment from the dual perspectives of feedback givers and receivers and framed them in terms of specific needs for student feedback literacy development. To address this research gap, this study explored the obstacles that Hong Kong university students experienced…
Descriptors: Barriers, Peer Evaluation, Undergraduate Students, Student Attitudes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Charalampous, Angelos; Darra, Maria – World Journal of Education, 2023
Feedback is an essential aspect of the teaching and learning process since it can objectively describe the learner's performance and guide him through revising their work to improve their academic performance. Studies regarding its application in education have recorded significant pedagogical benefits at the teaching and learning levels. The…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Revision (Written Composition), Error Correction, Writing Improvement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hamda Hanan; Mufeeda T.; Sajid A. Latheef – Changing English: Studies in Culture and Education, 2025
Earlier research has shown that translation holds the potential to combine close reading and critical authorship practices. But despite that, translation has occupied a marginal position as a creative writing practice in classrooms. Through practice-based research involving the students, the translators and the authors of the translated poems, the…
Descriptors: Writing Instruction, Creative Writing, Translation, Revision (Written Composition)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Hest, Julie – Waikato Journal of Education, 2022
Unexpected twists and turns on the PhD journey can be directly related to the research itself, while others are related to the experience of the journey. For me, the most unexpected aspects were related to my health and saw me transition from writing and typing to dictating to the computer. This autoethnographic article is based on the lived…
Descriptors: Verbal Communication, Revision (Written Composition), Doctoral Dissertations, Doctoral Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Fiona Richards; Nigel Harwood – International Journal for Educational Integrity, 2024
This article presents a research-based stakeholder tool informed by a study of the various types of changes proofreaders may make when proofreading a student text. Whilst the tool can be used to advise higher education students, (non-)professional proofreaders/editors, English for Academic Purposes (EAP) lecturers, writing centre tutors, and…
Descriptors: Proofreading, Writing Evaluation, Revision (Written Composition), English for Academic Purposes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Peter Cardon; Carolin Fleischmann; Minna Logemann; Jeanette Heidewald; Jolanta Aritz; Stephanie Swartz – Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 2024
Many experts project generative AI will impact the types of competencies that are valued among working professionals. This is the first known academic study to explore the views of business practitioners about the impacts of generative AI on skill sets. This survey of 692 business practitioners showed that business practitioners widely use…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Mediated Communication, Business Communication, Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Mutahar Qassem – Interactive Learning Environments, 2024
This article reports on an empirical study on cognitive processes [i.e. (dis) fluency, temporal management of the translation process, and revision] and their relationship with fluency and adequacy. Based on Jakobsen and Schou's (1999) computational model of human translation, the author utilizes keylogging data retrieved from a Translog-II-based…
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Language Fluency, Translation, English
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Flanigan, Abraham E.; Kiewra, Kenneth A.; Lu, Junrong; Dzhuraev, Dzhovid – Instructional Science: An International Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2023
Many college students believe that typing lecture notes on computers produces better notes and higher achievement than handwritten lecture notes on paper. The few studies investigating computer versus longhand note taking yielded mixed note-taking and achievement findings. The present study investigated computer versus longhand note taking but…
Descriptors: Computer Uses in Education, Notetaking, Revision (Written Composition), College Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Cheong, Choo Mui; Luo, Na; Zhu, Xinhua; Lu, Qi; Wei, Wei – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2023
Self-assessment is believed to complement peer assessment in the classroom. However, whether, how and why this is done remains unclear. This study, by investigating the combined use of self and peer assessment for an academic writing task among a group of undergraduate students in Hong Kong, aims to shed light on how self-assessment complements…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Students, Academic Language, Writing Assignments, Self Evaluation (Individuals)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Finkenstaedt-Quinn, Solaire A.; Watts, Field M.; Shultz, Ginger V.; Gere, Anne Ruggles – International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2023
The writing-to-learn (WTL) literature is varied in how assignments are structured and implemented in the classroom, making it difficult for instructors to identify how to incorporate writing effectively. Drawing on the WTL literature, the MWrite program was established to work with STEM faculty to design, implement, and assess evidence-based WTL…
Descriptors: STEM Education, Content Area Writing, Instructional Design, Concept Formation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jayne E. O. Stone – Composition Forum, 2024
In this article, I argue for centralizing revision in FYC classrooms, thereby establishing it as the vital component of composition that it is. I show that engagement with revision in FYC courses tends to be minimal, relegated to the end of a project, or completely omitted. These low standards for revision pedagogy can result in students not…
Descriptors: College Freshmen, College Faculty, Writing (Composition), Writing Instruction
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  ...  |  29