NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Source
Grantee Submission21
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Gates MacGinitie Reading Tests1
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 21 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Jianing Zhou; Ziheng Zeng; Hongyu Gong; Suma Bhat – Grantee Submission, 2022
Idiomatic expressions (IEs) play an essential role in natural language. In this paper, we study the task of idiomatic sentence paraphrasing (ISP), which aims to paraphrase a sentence with an IE by replacing the IE with its literal paraphrase. The lack of large scale corpora with idiomatic-literal parallel sentences is a primary challenge for this…
Descriptors: Language Patterns, Sentences, Language Processing, Phrase Structure
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jennifer Martinez; Daphne Greenberg; Cynthia Puranik; Jason Braasch; Charles MacArthur; Zoi Philippakos; Christine Miller – Grantee Submission, 2024
Motivational research identifies utility value, or the importance of a learning task to future goals, as central to motivation to learn. This study analyzed survey data (N=86) collected from adult literacy learners to examine their utility value of writing improvement in grammar and spelling skills, word processing skills, and planning, drafting,…
Descriptors: Writing Skills, Writing Improvement, Skill Development, Adult Basic Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Sharon Vaughn; Jeremy Miciak; Nathan Clemens; Jack M. Fletcher – Grantee Submission, 2024
We address defining and identifying students with dyslexia within the context of multi-tier systems of support (MTSS). We review proposed definitions of dyslexia, evidence for proposed definitional attributes, and emphasize the role of response to intervention in identifying students with dyslexia. We identify dyslexia as individuals with specific…
Descriptors: Dyslexia, Definitions, Revision (Written Composition), Multi Tiered Systems of Support
Kathryn S. McCarthy; Rod D. Roscoe; Laura K. Allen; Aaron D. Likens; Danielle S. McNamara – Grantee Submission, 2022
The benefits of writing strategy feedback are well established. This study examined the extent to which adding spelling and grammar checkers support writing and revision in comparison to providing writing strategy feedback alone. High school students (n = 119) wrote and revised six persuasive essays in Writing Pal, an automated writing evaluation…
Descriptors: High School Students, Automation, Writing Evaluation, Computer Software
Richard Correnti; Lindsay Clare Matsumura; Elaine Lin Wang; Diane Litman; Haoran Zhang – Grantee Submission, 2022
Recent reviews of automated writing evaluation systems indicate lack of uniformity in the purpose, design, and assessment of such systems. Our work lies at the nexus of critical themes arising from these reviews. We describe our work on eRevise, an automated writing evaluation system focused on elementary students' text-based evidence-use. eRevise…
Descriptors: Writing Evaluation, Feedback (Response), Automation, Elementary School Students
Wilson, Joshua; Huang, Yue; Palermo, Corey; Beard, Gaysha; MacArthur, Charles A. – Grantee Submission, 2021
This study examined a naturalistic, districtwide implementation of an automated writing evaluation (AWE) software program called "MI Write" in elementary schools. We specifically examined the degree to which aspects of MI Write were implemented, teacher and student attitudes towards MI Write, and whether MI Write usage along with other…
Descriptors: Automation, Writing Evaluation, Feedback (Response), Computer Software
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Afrin, Tazin; Wang, Elaine; Litman, Diane; Matsumura, Lindsay C.; Correnti, Richard – Grantee Submission, 2020
Automated writing evaluation systems can improve students' writing insofar as students attend to the feedback provided and revise their essay drafts in ways aligned with such feedback. Existing research on revision of argumentative writing in such systems, however, has focused on the types of revisions students make (e.g., surface vs. content)…
Descriptors: Writing (Composition), Persuasive Discourse, Revision (Written Composition), Documentation
Traga Philippakos, Zoi A.; MacArthur, Charles A.; Munsell, Sarah – Grantee Submission, 2018
The purpose of this study was to investigate how students who were enrolled in a developmental writing course at a community college used and adapted cognitive writing strategies learned in the course. The students participated in a funded research project for the development and evaluation of a writing curriculum based on self-regulated strategy…
Descriptors: Community Colleges, Two Year College Students, Writing Strategies, Writing (Composition)
Wang, Elaine Lin; Matsumura, Lindsay Clare; Correnti, Richard; Litman, Diane; Zhang, Haoran; Howe, Emily; Magooda, Ahmed; Quintana, Rafael – Grantee Submission, 2020
We investigate students' implementation of the feedback messages they received in an automated writing evaluation system ("eRevise") that aims to improve students' use of text evidence in their writing. Seven 5th and 6th-grade teachers implemented "eRevise" (n = 143 students). Qualitative analysis of students' essays across…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Writing Evaluation, Computer Software, Grade 5
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Allen, Laura K.; Jacovina, Matthew E.; Johnson, Adam C.; McNamara, Danielle S.; Roscoe, Rod D. – Grantee Submission, 2016
Revising is an essential writing process yet automated writing evaluation systems tend to give feedback on discrete essay drafts rather than changes across drafts. We explore the feasibility of automated revision detection and its potential to guide feedback. Relationships between revising behaviors and linguistic features of students' essays are…
Descriptors: Revision (Written Composition), Automation, Writing Evaluation, Feedback (Response)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Crossley, Scott A.; McNamara, Danielle S. – Grantee Submission, 2016
This study examines links between essay quality and text elaboration and text cohesion. For this study, 35 students wrote two essays (on two different prompts) and for each, were given 15 minutes to elaborate on their original text. An expert in discourse comprehension then modified the original and elaborated essays to increase cohesion,…
Descriptors: Essays, Writing Assignments, Writing Skills, Connected Discourse
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Zhang, H.; Magooda, A.; Litman, D.; Correnti, R.; Wang, E.; Matsumura, L. C.; Howe, E.; Quintana, R. – Grantee Submission, 2019
Writing a good essay typically involves students revising an initial paper draft after receiving feedback. We present eRevise, a web-based writing and revising environment that uses natural language processing features generated for rubric-based essay scoring to trigger formative feedback messages regarding students' use of evidence in…
Descriptors: Formative Evaluation, Essays, Writing (Composition), Revision (Written Composition)
Roscoe, Rod D.; Allen, Laura K.; Johnson, Adam C.; McNamara, Danielle S. – Grantee Submission, 2018
This study evaluates high school students' perceptions of automated writing feedback, and the influence of these perceptions on revising, as a function of varying modes of computer-based writing instruction. Findings indicate that students' perceptions of automated feedback accuracy, ease of use, relevance, and understandability were favorable.…
Descriptors: High School Students, Student Attitudes, Writing Evaluation, Feedback (Response)
Roscoe, Rod D.; Wilson, Joshua; Johnson, Adam C.; Mayra, Christopher R. – Grantee Submission, 2017
Automated writing evaluation (AWE) is a popular form of educational technology designed to supplement writing instruction and feedback, yet research on the effectiveness of AWE has observed mixed findings. The current study considered how students' perceptions of automated essay scoring and feedback influenced their writing performance, revising…
Descriptors: Student Attitudes, Writing Instruction, Writing Evaluation, Feedback (Response)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Lee, Hee-Sun; McNamara, Danielle; Bracey, Zoë Buck; Wilson, Christopher; Osborne, Jonathan; Haudek, Kevin C.; Liu, Ou Lydia; Pallant, Amy; Gerard, Libby; Linn, Marcia C.; Sherin, Bruce – Grantee Submission, 2019
Rapid advancements in computing have enabled automatic analyses of written texts created in educational settings. The purpose of this symposium is to survey several applications of computerized text analyses used in the research and development of productive learning environments. Four featured research projects have developed or been working on:…
Descriptors: Computational Linguistics, Written Language, Computer Assisted Testing, Scoring
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2