Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Error Correction | 3 |
Revision (Written Composition) | 3 |
Word Processing | 3 |
Cognitive Processes | 2 |
Spelling | 2 |
Achievement Tests | 1 |
Computer Software | 1 |
Computer Uses in Education | 1 |
Developmental Disabilities | 1 |
Editing | 1 |
Instructional Effectiveness | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 1 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Two Year Colleges | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Dynamic Indicators of Basic… | 1 |
Woodcock Johnson Tests of… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Woods-Groves, Suzanne; Hughes, Charles A.; Rodgers, Derek B.; Balint-Langel, Kinga; Alqahtani, Saeed S.; Neil, Katelyn M.; Hinzman, Michelle – Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 2020
The authors in this study used a pre-posttest experimental design with random assignment to treatment or control group to assess the use of an electronic editing cognitive strategy. The participants were 16 college students with intellectual and developmental disabilities enrolled in a 2-year postsecondary program at a Midwestern institute of…
Descriptors: Students with Disabilities, Intellectual Disability, Developmental Disabilities, Instructional Effectiveness
Leijten, Marielle; Van Waes, Luuk; Ransdell, Sarah – Written Communication, 2010
Error analysis involves detecting, diagnosing, and correcting discrepancies between the text produced so far (TPSF) and the writers mental representation of what the text should be. The use of different writing modes, like keyboard-based word processing and speech recognition, causes different type of errors during text production. While many…
Descriptors: Writing (Composition), Word Processing, Printed Materials, Revision (Written Composition)

MacArthur, Charles A.; And Others – Journal of Special Education, 1996
Two studies with a total of 82 students (grades 5-7) with learning disabilities found that, unaided, students corrected 9% of their errors; with spelling checkers, they corrected 37% of errors. Spelling checkers failed to identify about 30% of errors. Students usually selected the correct word from spelling checker suggestions. (Author/DB)
Descriptors: Computer Software, Error Correction, Intermediate Grades, Junior High Schools