NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 8 results Save | Export
Burdman, Debra – Academic Therapy, 1986
The article describes an approach by which word processing helps to solve some of the writing problems of learning disabled students. Aspects considered include prewriting, drafting, revising, and completing the story. (CL)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Learning Disabilities, Prewriting, Revision (Written Composition)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Stoddard, Barbra; MacArthur, Charles A. – Research in the Teaching of English, 1993
Finds an approach to improving revision skills that integrated strategy instruction, peer response, and word processing to be highly effective with seventh- and eighth-grade students with learning disabilities. (SR)
Descriptors: Instructional Effectiveness, Junior High Schools, Learning Disabilities, Peer Teaching
Collins, Terence G.; Price, Lynda – Learning Disabilities Focus, 1986
Word processing software can accommodate the writing deficiencies of high-functioning, learning-disabled college students, but documentation frequently needs revision for increased user-friendliness, better instructional layout, less complex syntax, and repetition of key concepts. A sample revision of one program is presented, focusing on switch…
Descriptors: College Students, Computer Software, Higher Education, Learning Disabilities
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
MacArthur, Charles A.; Graham, Steve – Journal of Special Education, 1987
Eleven fifth- and sixth-grade learning-disabled students composed and revised stories using handwriting, dictation, and word processing. Dictated stories differed from other formats on product measures such as length, quality, and grammatical errors. Differences between handwritten and word-processed stories were found on the process measures of…
Descriptors: Creative Writing, Dictation, Handwriting, Intermediate Grades
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
MacArthur, Charles A.; And Others – Journal of Special Education, 1996
Two studies with a total of 82 students (grades 5-7) with learning disabilities found that, unaided, students corrected 9% of their errors; with spelling checkers, they corrected 37% of errors. Spelling checkers failed to identify about 30% of errors. Students usually selected the correct word from spelling checker suggestions. (Author/DB)
Descriptors: Computer Software, Error Correction, Intermediate Grades, Junior High Schools
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
MacArthur, Charles; And Others – TEACHING Exceptional Children, 1994
This article describes a highly structured approach for improving the revising skills of students with learning disabilities that combines peer response, strategy instruction, and word processing. The strategy guides students in both the social and cognitive aspects of response and revision. Two studies demonstrating the effectiveness of the…
Descriptors: Cooperative Learning, Elementary Secondary Education, Learning Disabilities, Learning Strategies
Shermis, Michael – 1989
Addressing writing instruction for students with special needs, this annotated bibliography contains 26 references of articles and papers in the ERIC database. The citations in the first section discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using word processors in writing instruction with learning disabled (LD) students and suggest instructional…
Descriptors: Annotated Bibliographies, Computer Assisted Instruction, Editing, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Graham, Steve; MacArthur, Charles – Journal of Special Education, 1988
Three learning-disabled students, aged 10-11, received self-instructional strategy training for improving revision skills for essays they composed on a word processor. Strategy instruction positively impacted on students' revising behavior and the length and quality of their written products. Effects were maintained over time and generalized to…
Descriptors: Autoinstructional Aids, Essays, Generalization, Intermediate Grades