Publication Date
In 2025 | 7 |
Since 2024 | 25 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 80 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 146 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 192 |
Descriptor
Revision (Written Composition) | 389 |
Writing Evaluation | 389 |
Writing Instruction | 235 |
Writing Processes | 126 |
Teaching Methods | 120 |
Feedback (Response) | 111 |
Higher Education | 96 |
Writing Improvement | 95 |
Writing Skills | 92 |
Peer Evaluation | 89 |
Second Language Learning | 88 |
More ▼ |
Source
Author
Wilson, Joshua | 6 |
Litman, Diane | 5 |
McNamara, Danielle S. | 5 |
Allen, Laura K. | 4 |
Roscoe, Rod D. | 4 |
Schunn, Christian D. | 4 |
Johnson, Adam C. | 3 |
Rijlaarsdam, Gert | 3 |
Saeed, Murad Abdu | 3 |
Beard, Gaysha | 2 |
Berkenkotter, Carol | 2 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
Practitioners | 57 |
Teachers | 46 |
Researchers | 5 |
Students | 2 |
Administrators | 1 |
Location
China | 18 |
Iran | 6 |
Taiwan | 6 |
Canada | 4 |
Vietnam | 4 |
Indonesia | 3 |
Japan | 3 |
Saudi Arabia | 3 |
South Korea | 3 |
Algeria | 2 |
California | 2 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
International English… | 2 |
Gates MacGinitie Reading Tests | 1 |
General Educational… | 1 |
Test of English as a Foreign… | 1 |
Test of English for… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Han Zhang; Jamie Costley; Matthew Courtney; Galina Shulgina; Mik Fanguy – Education and Information Technologies, 2025
Depending on the nature of comments made during peer review of academic writing, students may be able to evaluate and revise their performance. Therefore, it is essential to explore how the content of comments affects student writing. Since peer review is a process of interaction, it is critical to understand how comments affect student academic…
Descriptors: Graduate Students, Content Area Writing, Academic Language, Feedback (Response)
Lifang Bai; Yijia Wei – IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 2024
ChatGPT can promptly reformulate a text and improve its quality in content and form while preserving the original meaning. Yet, little is known about how learners respond to such reformulations. Here, we employed a three-stage writing task (composing-comparison-rewriting) to investigate how learners notice, integrate, and perceive ChatGPT's…
Descriptors: English (Second Language), Second Language Learning, Writing Evaluation, Artificial Intelligence
Fiona Richards; Nigel Harwood – International Journal for Educational Integrity, 2024
This article presents a research-based stakeholder tool informed by a study of the various types of changes proofreaders may make when proofreading a student text. Whilst the tool can be used to advise higher education students, (non-)professional proofreaders/editors, English for Academic Purposes (EAP) lecturers, writing centre tutors, and…
Descriptors: Proofreading, Writing Evaluation, Revision (Written Composition), English for Academic Purposes
Hongzhi Yang; Chuan Gao; Hui-zhong Shen – Education and Information Technologies, 2024
Recently, artificial intelligence (AI)-programmed automated writing evaluation (AWE) has attracted increasing attention in language research. Using a small data set arising from an analysis of five Chinese university-level English as a foreign language (EFL) students' submissions, this paper examined in detail how EFL students interacted with the…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Programming, Writing Evaluation, Computer Mediated Communication
Denise N. Morgan; Jessica L. Hrubik – Literacy Research and Instruction, 2025
Revision is a complex cognitive task and an integral component of the writing process. Students benefit from understanding the value of and how to revise their own writing. The purpose of this study was to turn to students to investigate their understandings of revision. We posed the following question: What are 7th graders' perceptions and…
Descriptors: Middle School Students, Grade 7, Writing (Composition), Writing Evaluation
Melissa Mustika; Charles Y. C. Yeh; Hercy N. H. Cheng; Calvin C. Y. Liao; Tak-Wai Chan – Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2025
Background Study: The integration of mind maps as a prewriting activity has shown potential in enhancing students' writing skills, yet there is limited research focusing specifically on third-grade elementary students' descriptive narrative creative writing within technology-enhanced learning environments. The use of digital tools, such as writing…
Descriptors: Concept Mapping, Prewriting, Writing (Composition), Narration
Hsieh, Yi-Chin; Hill, Christopher – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2022
In this study, a micro-level approach was used to investigate how college students in an academic writing course interact with peer and instructor feedback at "different stages" of the writing process. Participants were 146 first-year students at a Singaporean university. A survey and focus group interviews concerning students'…
Descriptors: Writing (Composition), Writing Evaluation, Peer Evaluation, Feedback (Response)
Richards, K. Andrew R.; Hemphill, Michael A.; Flory, Sara B. – Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 2022
While there are benefits to collaborative research, navigating group dynamics can also bring challenges, particularly for doctoral students and early career academics who are new to the research process. These dynamics extend beyond initial manuscript submission and include processes associated with interpreting reviewer comments, deciding upon…
Descriptors: Doctoral Students, Student Research, Group Dynamics, Publications
Shujun Liu; Azzeddine Boudouaia; Xinya Chen; Yan Li – Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 2025
The application of Automated Writing Evaluation (AWE) has recently gained researchers' attention worldwide. However, the impact of AWE feedback on student writing, particularly in languages other than English, remains controversial. This study aimed to compare the impacts of Chinese AWE feedback and teacher feedback on Chinese writing revision,…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Middle School Students, Grade 7, Writing Evaluation
Dally, Kerry; Holbrook, Allyson; Lovat, Terence; Fairbairn, Hedy – Higher Education Research and Development, 2022
There has been substantial research on doctoral supervision and examination, yet rarely a focus on what happens at the end-stage of the process when examiner feedback is received and addressed. This article reports survey findings (n = 262) from a study investigating supervisor perceptions about Australian end-stage doctoral examination processes.…
Descriptors: Doctoral Students, Doctoral Dissertations, Writing Evaluation, Supervision
Jing Yan; Yu Zhu; Xinrong Ye – SAGE Open, 2024
Research on how peer feedback affects second language (L2) writing in higher education has been limited. This study examines the impact of peer feedback on revision and literature review writing in learners of Chinese as an L2 at a university in mainland China. The study analyzed feedback, revisions, and writing performance of 30 students. The…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Feedback (Response), Writing Evaluation, Literature Reviews
Tremblay, Kathryn A.; Binder, Katherine S.; Chuy, Anneli – COABE Journal: The Resource for Adult Education, 2022
This study sought to examine the pre-task planning and post-task revising practices of adults with low literacy and how those practices affect overall writing quality. Seventy-six adults with low literacy composed essays in response to a prompt and were given time for pre-task planning and post-task revising. Results showed that participants with…
Descriptors: Adult Students, Adult Basic Education, Adult Literacy, Writing Skills
Kristie L. Miner – ProQuest LLC, 2022
Educators play an important role in ensuring that students attain the necessary strategic actions to become skilled writers. Studies have indicated that teachers need to consistently embed a larger range of evidence-based writing practices in their instruction to help their students improve the overall quantity and quality of their writing. The…
Descriptors: Writing Instruction, Writing Strategies, Instructional Effectiveness, Prewriting
Yishen Song; Qianta Zhu; Huaibo Wang; Qinhua Zheng – IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 2024
Manually scoring and revising student essays has long been a time-consuming task for educators. With the rise of natural language processing techniques, automated essay scoring (AES) and automated essay revising (AER) have emerged to alleviate this burden. However, current AES and AER models require large amounts of training data and lack…
Descriptors: Scoring, Essays, Writing Evaluation, Computer Software
Susan Lang; Clinton Morrison Jr.; Kathleen Brawley – Writing Center Journal, 2024
What do writers do with the feedback they receive? While the answer will vary depending on the writer's experience and the rhetorical situation, understanding what writers do can provide important information for course redesign and professional development of tutors and instructors. In this first of two manuscripts, the authors examine how…
Descriptors: Laboratories, Writing (Composition), Writing Instruction, Tutoring