NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing 61 to 75 of 2,221 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Grant Eckstein; Ying Suet Michelle Lung; Natasha Gillette – TESL-EJ, 2025
Students are often encouraged to proofread their writing by reading it aloud. Presumably, this will allow writers to correct local errors. Yet even though this strategy may be effective for native speakers, there is little empirical evidence of its benefit among second language writers. Therefore, we wondered how many errors second language…
Descriptors: Proofreading, English (Second Language), Second Language Learning, Second Language Instruction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hugh W. Catts; Nicole Patton Terry; Christopher J. Lonigan; Donald L. Compton; Richard K. Wagner; Laura M. Steacy; Kelly Farquharson; Yaacov Petscher – Annals of Dyslexia, 2024
The International Dyslexia Association definition of dyslexia was updated 20 years ago and has been referenced frequently in research and practice. In this paper, researchers from the Florida Center for Reading Research consider the components of the definition and make recommendations for revisions. These include recognizing the persistence of…
Descriptors: Dyslexia, Definitions, Reading Research, Revision (Written Composition)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Albert W. Li; Michael Hebert – Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2024
Online peer feedback has become prevalent in university writing classes due to the widespread use of peer learning technology. This paper reports an exploratory study of Chinese-speaking undergraduate students' experiences of receiving and reflecting on online peer feedback for text revision in an English as a second language (L2) writing…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Undergraduate Students, English Language Learners, English (Second Language)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Sharon Vaughn; Jeremy Miciak; Nathan Clemens; Jack M. Fletcher – Grantee Submission, 2024
We address defining and identifying students with dyslexia within the context of multi-tier systems of support (MTSS). We review proposed definitions of dyslexia, evidence for proposed definitional attributes, and emphasize the role of response to intervention in identifying students with dyslexia. We identify dyslexia as individuals with specific…
Descriptors: Dyslexia, Definitions, Revision (Written Composition), Multi Tiered Systems of Support
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Sharon Vaughn; Jeremy Miciak; Nathan Clemens; Jack M. Fletcher – Annals of Dyslexia, 2024
We address defining and identifying students with dyslexia within the context of multi-tier systems of support (MTSS). We review proposed definitions of dyslexia, evidence for proposed definitional attributes, and emphasize the role of instructional response in identifying students with dyslexia. We identify dyslexia as individuals with specific…
Descriptors: Dyslexia, Definitions, Revision (Written Composition), Multi Tiered Systems of Support
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Holtz, Jill W.; Daly, Edward J. – Contemporary School Psychology, 2021
Learning to revise one's writing is a critical part of learning how to write. However, critical feedback and demands to make revisions can make writing aversive for some students, particularly students with poor writing skills. Allowing students to escape further writing tasks contingent on making revisions to written drafts (differential negative…
Descriptors: Revision (Written Composition), Reinforcement, Behavior Modification, Teaching Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Dally, Kerry; Holbrook, Allyson; Lovat, Terence; Fairbairn, Hedy – Higher Education Research and Development, 2022
There has been substantial research on doctoral supervision and examination, yet rarely a focus on what happens at the end-stage of the process when examiner feedback is received and addressed. This article reports survey findings (n = 262) from a study investigating supervisor perceptions about Australian end-stage doctoral examination processes.…
Descriptors: Doctoral Students, Doctoral Dissertations, Writing Evaluation, Supervision
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Chen, Jing; Zhang, Lawrence Jun; Parr, Judy M. – Metacognition and Learning, 2022
Effective revision necessitates substantial self-regulation in managing the underlying sub-processes and in drawing on relevant knowledge and strategies. Unskilled writers, especially when they have to write in a second/foreign language (L2/FL), might find revision difficult to execute. This study leveraged on the Self-Regulated Strategy…
Descriptors: English Language Learners, English (Second Language), Revision (Written Composition), Self Management
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Locke, Sean R.; Osborne, Jenna; Jung, Mary E. – Collected Essays on Learning and Teaching, 2023
The iterative process of writing a co-authored manuscript may take several months to complete. Draft-in-a-day is an alternative group-based approach to writing that draws on concepts from social cognitive and group dynamics theories to efficiently write the first draft of a manuscript, while providing rich opportunities for trainees to develop…
Descriptors: Collaborative Writing, Writing Processes, Authors, Revision (Written Composition)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Andrés Alexis Ramírez-Coronel; Jazmín Cevasco; Franco Londra; Gastón Saux – European Journal of Psychology of Education, 2024
Misconceptions or inaccurate ideas about Alzheimer's disease (AD) can be found in college students from health-related careers. Refutation texts explicitly introduce inaccurate information, refute it, and introduce alternative, more accurate information. This study examined the role of refutation texts in revising misconceptions about AD in…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Undergraduate Students, Nursing Students, Nursing Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jing Yan; Yu Zhu; Xinrong Ye – SAGE Open, 2024
Research on how peer feedback affects second language (L2) writing in higher education has been limited. This study examines the impact of peer feedback on revision and literature review writing in learners of Chinese as an L2 at a university in mainland China. The study analyzed feedback, revisions, and writing performance of 30 students. The…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Feedback (Response), Writing Evaluation, Literature Reviews
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Cowan, Mairi; Evans-Tokaryk, Tyler; Farooqi, Abdullah; Graham, Allison; Kaler, Michael – International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2021
On a revise-and-resubmit assignment in a large introductory History course, students were provided with feedback that was phrased either as questions, statements, or imperatives. This study examines which form was most likely to lead to improvement in the students' writing. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to analyze a data set…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Writing Improvement, College Freshmen, History
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Leng, Jing; Yi, Yuhe; Gu, Xiaoqing – Educational Technology Research and Development, 2021
The rapid development of social media tools has drawn much research interest in teacher education. This development has suggested that a wiki with discussion (i.e., an enhanced wiki) seems valuable in facilitating online collaborative and interactive learning. This study examined dynamic patterns of revision behavior in group writing by…
Descriptors: Collaborative Writing, Interaction, Cooperation, Preservice Teachers
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Watts, Julie – Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 2021
Technical and professional communication master's students work with a faculty advisor to complete a three-credit independent research (IR) project, featuring original research. Stakeholders recommended the IR thesis be revised to better communicate IR to industry. Using a writing, activity theory, and genre theory lens, I analyzed what…
Descriptors: Graduate Students, Student Research, Masters Theses, Revision (Written Composition)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Elena Shvidko – Journal on Empowering Teaching Excellence, 2021
Providing feedback on student work is a fundamental aspect of instruction and an important part of the learning process. A considerable amount of literature describes the pedagogical value of different types of feedback--explicit vs. implicit, comprehensive vs. selective, direct vs. indirect, and feedback on content vs. feedback on form--thus…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Teacher Student Relationship, Writing (Composition), Writing Instruction
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  ...  |  149