Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 2 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 2 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Sample Size | 2 |
Statistical Distributions | 2 |
Classification | 1 |
Correlation | 1 |
Evaluation Methods | 1 |
Monte Carlo Methods | 1 |
Predictor Variables | 1 |
Profiles | 1 |
Reliability | 1 |
Structural Equation Models | 1 |
Source
Structural Equation Modeling:… | 2 |
Author
Aaron T. McLaughlin | 1 |
Daryl R. Van Tongeren | 1 |
Kevin J. Grimm | 1 |
Li-Jen Weng | 1 |
Russell P. Houpt | 1 |
Tong-Rong Yang | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 2 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Tong-Rong Yang; Li-Jen Weng – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2024
In Savalei's (2011) simulation that evaluated the performance of polychoric correlation estimates in small samples, two methods for treating zero-frequency cells, adding 0.5 (ADD) and doing nothing (NONE), were compared. Savalei tentatively suggested using ADD for binary data and NONE for data with three or more categories. Yet, Savalei's…
Descriptors: Correlation, Statistical Distributions, Monte Carlo Methods, Sample Size
Russell P. Houpt; Kevin J. Grimm; Aaron T. McLaughlin; Daryl R. Van Tongeren – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2024
Numerous methods exist to determine the optimal number of classes when using latent profile analysis (LPA), but none are consistently correct. Recently, the likelihood incremental percentage per parameter (LI3P) was proposed as a model effect-size measure. To evaluate the LI3P more thoroughly, we simulated 50,000 datasets, manipulating factors…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Profiles, Sample Size, Evaluation Methods