NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20250
Since 20240
Since 2021 (last 5 years)0
Since 2016 (last 10 years)0
Since 2006 (last 20 years)4
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Higher Education Act 19651
Assessments and Surveys
National Longitudinal Study…1
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 20 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Citkowicz, Martyna; Hedges, Larry V. – Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2013
In some instances, intentionally or not, study designs are such that there is clustering in one group but not in the other. This paper describes methods for computing effect size estimates and their variances when there is clustering in only one group and the analysis has not taken that clustering into account. The authors provide the effect size…
Descriptors: Multivariate Analysis, Effect Size, Sampling, Sample Size
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Phillips, Gary W. – Applied Measurement in Education, 2015
This article proposes that sampling design effects have potentially huge unrecognized impacts on the results reported by large-scale district and state assessments in the United States. When design effects are unrecognized and unaccounted for they lead to underestimating the sampling error in item and test statistics. Underestimating the sampling…
Descriptors: State Programs, Sampling, Research Design, Error of Measurement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Ingels, Steven J.; Glennie, Elizabeth; Lauff, Erich; Wirt, John G. – National Center for Education Statistics, 2012
This report describes patterns of continuity and change over time in four areas of the transition to adulthood among young adults as measured 2 years after their senior year of high school. The four areas are postsecondary enrollment, labor force roles, family formation, and civic engagement through voting or military service. The analysis…
Descriptors: Military Service, High Schools, Marital Status, Young Adults
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Zou, Guang Yong – Psychological Methods, 2007
Confidence intervals are widely accepted as a preferred way to present study results. They encompass significance tests and provide an estimate of the magnitude of the effect. However, comparisons of correlations still rely heavily on significance testing. The persistence of this practice is caused primarily by the lack of simple yet accurate…
Descriptors: Intervals, Effect Size, Research Methodology, Correlation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Morse, David T. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1998
Describes MINSIZE, an MS-DOS computer program that permits the user to determine the minimum sample size needed for the results of a given analysis to be statistically significant. Program applications for statistical significance tests are presented and illustrated. (SLD)
Descriptors: Computer Software, Effect Size, Sample Size, Sampling
Lewis, Charla P. – 1999
The sampling distribution is a common source of misuse and misunderstanding in the study of statistics. The sampling distribution, underlying distribution, and the Central Limit Theorem are all interconnected in defining and explaining the proper use of the sampling distribution of various statistics. The sampling distribution of a statistic is…
Descriptors: Estimation (Mathematics), Probability, Sample Size, Sampling
Rennie, Kimberly M. – 1997
This paper explains the underlying assumptions of the sampling distribution and its role in significance testing. To compute statistical significance, estimates of population parameters must be obtained so that only one sampling distribution is defined. A sampling distribution is the underlying distribution of a statistic. Sampling distributions…
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Estimation (Mathematics), Sample Size, Sampling
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hiller, Dana V.; Philliber, William W. – Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1985
A review of articles that report study results based on couple samples indicated response rates are rarely high enough for statistical inference. Four procedures that can be used to compensate for insufficient response rates (collecting information from nonparticipants, census comparisons, adjustment in analysis, and replication) are examined.…
Descriptors: Generalization, Influences, Research Problems, Sample Size
Ferrell, Charlotte M. – 1992
Statistical significance is often misinterpreted to mean replicability or generalizability of results, although a statistically significant difference does not equal a reliable difference. Sample splitting procedures may be a more accurate way of estimating research result generalizability. This type of cross-validation involves randomly dividing…
Descriptors: Equations (Mathematics), Generalization, Mathematical Models, Predictive Measurement
Giroir, Mary M.; Davidson, Betty M. – 1989
Replication is important to viable scientific inquiry; results that will not replicate or generalize are of very limited value. Statistical significance enables the researcher to reject or not reject the null hypothesis according to the sample results obtained, but statistical significance does not indicate the probability that results will be…
Descriptors: Estimation (Mathematics), Generalizability Theory, Hypothesis Testing, Probability
Thompson, Bruce – 1992
Three criticisms of overreliance on results from statistical significance tests are noted. It is suggested that: (1) statistical significance tests are often tautological; (2) some uses can involve comparisons that are not completely sensible; and (3) using statistical significance tests to evaluate both methodological assumptions (e.g., the…
Descriptors: Effect Size, Estimation (Mathematics), Evaluation Methods, Regression (Statistics)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Harris, Richard J.; Quade, Dana – Journal of Educational Statistics, 1992
A method is proposed for calculating the sample size needed to achieve acceptable statistical power with a given test. The minimally important difference significant (MIDS) criterion for sample size is explained and supported with recommendations for determining sample size. The MIDS criterion is computationally simple and easy to explain. (SLD)
Descriptors: Equations (Mathematics), Estimation (Mathematics), Experimental Groups, Mathematical Models
Neel, John H.; Stallings, William M. – 1974
An influential statistics test recommends a Levene text for homogeneity of variance. A recent note suggests that Levene's test is upwardly biased for small samples. Another report shows inflated Alpha estimates and low power. Neither study utilized more than two sample sizes. This Monte Carlo study involved sampling from a normal population for…
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Educational Research, Hypothesis Testing, Monte Carlo Methods
Olejnik, Stephen; Algina, James – 1987
The purpose of this study was to develop a single procedure for comparing population variances which could be used for distribution forms. Bootstrap methodology was used to estimate the variability of the sample variance statistic when the population distribution was normal, platykurtic and leptokurtic. The data for the study were generated and…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Estimation (Mathematics), Measurement Techniques, Monte Carlo Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Barbella, Peter; And Others – Mathematics Teacher, 1990
Demonstrates a statistically valid method allowing students to explore randomization. Described are two examples: counting techniques for a small set of data and simulation for a large sample. (YP)
Descriptors: Data Analysis, Data Interpretation, Mathematical Concepts, Mathematical Logic
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2