NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 43 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Suppanut Sriutaisuk; Yu Liu; Seungwon Chung; Hanjoe Kim; Fei Gu – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2025
The multiple imputation two-stage (MI2S) approach holds promise for evaluating the model fit of structural equation models for ordinal variables with multiply imputed data. However, previous studies only examined the performance of MI2S-based residual-based test statistics. This study extends previous research by examining the performance of two…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Error of Measurement, Programming Languages, Goodness of Fit
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Chunhua Cao; Xinya Liang – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2024
Cross-loadings are common in multiple-factor confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) but often ignored in measurement invariance testing. This study examined the impact of ignoring cross-loadings on the sensitivity of fit measures (CFI, RMSEA, SRMR, SRMRu, AIC, BIC, SaBIC, LRT) to measurement noninvariance. The manipulated design factors included the…
Descriptors: Goodness of Fit, Error of Measurement, Sample Size, Factor Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Phillip K. Wood – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2024
The logistic and confined exponential curves are frequently used in studies of growth and learning. These models, which are nonlinear in their parameters, can be estimated using structural equation modeling software. This paper proposes a single combined model, a weighted combination of both models. Mplus, Proc Calis, and lavaan code for the model…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Computation, Computer Software, Weighted Scores
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Chunhua Cao; Benjamin Lugu; Jujia Li – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2024
This study examined the false positive (FP) rates and sensitivity of Bayesian fit indices to structural misspecification in Bayesian structural equation modeling. The impact of measurement quality, sample size, model size, the magnitude of misspecified path effect, and the choice or prior on the performance of the fit indices was also…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Bayesian Statistics, Measurement, Error of Measurement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Xiaohui Luo; Yueqin Hu – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2024
Intensive longitudinal data has been widely used to examine reciprocal or causal relations between variables. However, these variables may not be temporally aligned. This study examined the consequences and solutions of the problem of temporal misalignment in intensive longitudinal data based on dynamic structural equation models. First the impact…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Longitudinal Studies, Data Analysis, Causal Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Chunhua Cao; Xinya Liang – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2022
Exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM) allows for the estimation of all cross-loadings, which leads to the number of parameters estimated substantially greater than that in conventional SEM. This study examined the sensitivity of fit measures (CFI, RMSEA, AIC, BIC, SaBIC, LRT) to measurement noninvariance in ESEM. Results suggested that…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Error of Measurement, Computation, Goodness of Fit
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Emma Somer; Carl Falk; Milica Miocevic – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2024
Factor Score Regression (FSR) is increasingly employed as an alternative to structural equation modeling (SEM) in small samples. Despite its popularity in psychology, the performance of FSR in multigroup models with small samples remains relatively unknown. The goal of this study was to examine the performance of FSR, namely Croon's correction and…
Descriptors: Scores, Structural Equation Models, Comparative Analysis, Sample Size
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Fu, Yuanshu; Wen, Zhonglin; Wang, Yang – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2022
Composite reliability, or coefficient omega, can be estimated using structural equation modeling. Composite reliability is usually estimated under the basic independent clusters model of confirmatory factor analysis (ICM-CFA). However, due to the existence of cross-loadings, the model fit of the exploratory structural equation model (ESEM) is…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Structural Equation Models, Factor Analysis, Reliability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Pavlov, Goran; Maydeu-Olivares, Alberto; Shi, Dexin – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2021
We examine the accuracy of p values obtained using the asymptotic mean and variance (MV) correction to the distribution of the sample standardized root mean squared residual (SRMR) proposed by Maydeu-Olivares to assess the exact fit of SEM models. In a simulation study, we found that under normality, the MV-corrected SRMR statistic provides…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Goodness of Fit, Simulation, Error of Measurement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bogaert, Jasper; Loh, Wen Wei; Rosseel, Yves – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2023
Factor score regression (FSR) is widely used as a convenient alternative to traditional structural equation modeling (SEM) for assessing structural relations between latent variables. But when latent variables are simply replaced by factor scores, biases in the structural parameter estimates often have to be corrected, due to the measurement error…
Descriptors: Factor Analysis, Regression (Statistics), Structural Equation Models, Error of Measurement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ben Kelcey; Fangxing Bai; Amota Ataneka; Yanli Xie; Kyle Cox – Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2024
We develop a structural after measurement (SAM) method for structural equation models (SEMs) that accommodates missing data. The results show that the proposed SAM missing data estimator outperforms conventional full information (FI) estimators in terms of convergence, bias, and root-mean-square-error in small-to-moderate samples or large samples…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Research Problems, Error of Measurement, Maximum Likelihood Statistics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jobst, Lisa J.; Auerswald, Max; Moshagen, Morten – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2022
Prior studies investigating the effects of non-normality in structural equation modeling typically induced non-normality in the indicator variables. This procedure neglects the factor analytic structure of the data, which is defined as the sum of latent variables and errors, so it is unclear whether previous results hold if the source of…
Descriptors: Goodness of Fit, Structural Equation Models, Error of Measurement, Factor Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Cao, Chunhua; Kim, Eun Sook; Chen, Yi-Hsin; Ferron, John; Stark, Stephen – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2019
In multilevel multiple-indicator multiple-cause (MIMIC) models, covariates can interact at the within level, at the between level, or across levels. This study examines the performance of multilevel MIMIC models in estimating and detecting the interaction effect of two covariates through a simulation and provides an empirical demonstration of…
Descriptors: Hierarchical Linear Modeling, Structural Equation Models, Computation, Identification
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Li, Jian; Lomax, Richard G. – Journal of Experimental Education, 2017
Using Monte Carlo simulations, this research examined the performance of four missing data methods in SEM under different multivariate distributional conditions. The effects of four independent variables (sample size, missing proportion, distribution shape, and factor loading magnitude) were investigated on six outcome variables: convergence rate,…
Descriptors: Monte Carlo Methods, Structural Equation Models, Evaluation Methods, Measurement Techniques
Yuan, Ke-Hai; Zhang, Zhiyong; Zhao, Yanyun – Grantee Submission, 2017
The normal-distribution-based likelihood ratio statistic T[subscript ml] = nF[subscript ml] is widely used for power analysis in structural Equation modeling (SEM). In such an analysis, power and sample size are computed by assuming that T[subscript ml] follows a central chi-square distribution under H[subscript 0] and a noncentral chi-square…
Descriptors: Statistical Analysis, Evaluation Methods, Structural Equation Models, Reliability
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3