NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Education Level
Audience
Researchers4
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
National Longitudinal Study…2
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 36 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Carroll, Robert M.; Faden, Vivian B. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1978
Some sampling characteristics of three estimators of the intraclass correlation were investigated under a variety of conditions within the context of a one-way analysis of variance. The results promote caution in the use of all three estimators. The three estimators differed very little in their bias or in their standard errors. (Author/JKS)
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Correlation, Research Design, Sampling
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Overall, John E.; Woodward J. Arthur – Psychometrika, 1974
A procedure for testing heterogeneity of variance is developed which generalizes readily to complex, multi-factor experimental designs. Monte Carlo studies indicate that the Z-variance test statistic presented here yields results equivalent to other familiar tests for heterogeneity of variance in simple one-way designs where comparisons are…
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Hypothesis Testing, Research Design, Sampling
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Williams, John D.; Wali, Mohan K. – Multiple Linear Regression Viewpoints, 1979
An experimental sampling procedure for communities on which coal had been surface-mined yielded missing cells and caused the number of degrees of freedom to be N instead of the usual N minus one. The apparent discrepancy is explained, and a solution to the problem is presented. (Author/JKS)
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Research Design, Research Problems, Sampling
McKillip, Jack – Evaluation Quarterly, 1979
Flexibility in evaluative research design does not necessitate the abandonment of randomly constructed comparison groups. Three designs are reviewed which provide at least the option of randomization while maintaining great flexibility. The strengths and weaknesses of the designs are discussed. (Author)
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Control Groups, Evaluation Methods, Program Evaluation
Kroeker, Leonard P. – 1974
The problem of blocking on a status variable was investigated. The one-way fixed-effects analysis of variance, analysis of covariance, and generalized randomized block designs each treat the blocking problem in a different way. In order to compare these designs, it is necessary to restrict attention to experimental situations in which observations…
Descriptors: Analysis of Covariance, Analysis of Variance, Hypothesis Testing, Research Design
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Smith, Philip L. – Journal of Educational Statistics, 1978
The paper describes the small sample stability of least square estimates of variance components within the context of generalizability theory. Monte Carlo methods are used to generate data conforming to some selected multifacet generalizability designs to illustrate the sampling behavior of variance component estimates. (Author/CTM)
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Minicomputers, Monte Carlo Methods, Reliability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Das, J. P.; Kirby, John R. – Journal of Educational Psychology, 1978
Humphreys' comments on double-median splits (TM 504 009) are essentially correct, but are not relevant to the original Kirby and Das article (EJ 182 444). His comments do not weaken our findings. (Author/RD)
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Data Analysis, Individual Differences, Predictor Variables
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Forsyth, Robert A. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1978
This note shows that, under conditions specified by Levin and Subkoviak (TM 503 420), it is not necessary to specify the reliabilities of observed scores when comparing completely randomized designs with randomized block designs. Certain errors in their illustrative example are also discussed. (Author/CTM)
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Error of Measurement, Hypothesis Testing, Reliability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Levin, Joel R.; Subkoviak, Michael J. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1978
Comments (TM 503 706) on an earlier article (TM 503 420) concerning the comparison of the completely randomized design and the randomized block design are acknowledged and appreciated. In addition, potentially misleading notions arising from these comments are addressed and clarified. (See also TM 503 708). (Author/CTM)
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Error of Measurement, Hypothesis Testing, Reliability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Forsyth, Robert A. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1978
This note continues the discussion of earlier articles (TM 503 420, TM 503 706, and TM 503 707), comparing the completely randomized design with the randomized block design. (CTM)
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Error of Measurement, Hypothesis Testing, Reliability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Barcikowski, Robert S.; Holthouse, Norman – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1972
Descriptors: Analysis of Covariance, Analysis of Variance, Behavioral Sciences, Computer Programs
Cardinet, Jean; Allal, Linda – New Directions for Testing and Measurement, 1983
A general framework for conducting generalizability analyses is presented. Generalizability theory is extended to situations in which the objects of measurement are not persons but other factors, such as instructional objectives, stages of learning, and treatments. (Author/PN)
Descriptors: Algorithms, Analysis of Variance, Estimation (Mathematics), Mathematical Formulas
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Sirotnik, Kenneth; Wellington, Roger – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1977
A single conceptual and theoretical framework for sampling any configuration of data from one or more population matrices is presented, integrating past designs and discussing implications for more general designs. The theory is based upon a generalization of the generalized symmetric mean approach for single matrix samples. (Author/CTM)
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Data Analysis, Item Sampling, Mathematical Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Levin, Joel R. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1975
A set procedure developed in this study is useful in determining sample size, based on specification of linear contrasts involving certain formula treatments. (Author/DEP)
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Comparative Analysis, Mathematical Models, Measurement Techniques
PDF pending restoration PDF pending restoration
Williams, John D.; Wali, Mohan K.
A solution is proposed for analysis of variance procedures with missing cells, such as may occur when a control group is not assigned to any of the rows or columns of the various experimental groups. Mathematical models for two-way design are presented which define several variables; as well as row effect, column effect, and row and column…
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Control Groups, Experimental Groups, Hypothesis Testing
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3