Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Error of Measurement | 2 |
| Measurement | 2 |
| Sampling | 2 |
| Standardized Tests | 2 |
| Ability Grouping | 1 |
| Achievement Tests | 1 |
| Computation | 1 |
| Content Analysis | 1 |
| Differences | 1 |
| Difficulty Level | 1 |
| Educational Assessment | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Duong, Minh Q. | 1 |
| Jaciw, Andrew P. | 1 |
| Olsen, Robert B. | 1 |
| Price, Cristofer | 1 |
| Unlu, Fatih | 1 |
| von Davier, Alina A. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Numerical/Quantitative Data | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Arizona | 1 |
| California | 1 |
| Missouri | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkDuong, Minh Q.; von Davier, Alina A. – International Journal of Testing, 2012
Test equating is a statistical procedure for adjusting for test form differences in difficulty in a standardized assessment. Equating results are supposed to hold for a specified target population (Kolen & Brennan, 2004; von Davier, Holland, & Thayer, 2004) and to be (relatively) independent of the subpopulations from the target population (see…
Descriptors: Ability Grouping, Difficulty Level, Psychometrics, Statistical Analysis
Download full textOlsen, Robert B.; Unlu, Fatih; Price, Cristofer; Jaciw, Andrew P. – National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, 2011
This report examines the differences in impact estimates and standard errors that arise when these are derived using state achievement tests only (as pre-tests and post-tests), study-administered tests only, or some combination of state- and study-administered tests. State tests may yield different evaluation results relative to a test that is…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Standardized Tests, State Standards, Reading Achievement
