Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Federal Legislation | 6 |
| Sanctions | 6 |
| Accountability | 5 |
| Educational Finance | 5 |
| Educational Indicators | 4 |
| Federal Programs | 4 |
| Academic Achievement | 3 |
| Educational Legislation | 3 |
| Achievement Gap | 2 |
| Conflict of Interest | 2 |
| Costs | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Reports - Descriptive | 3 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Historical Materials | 1 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Secondary Education | 6 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Elementary and Secondary… | 6 |
| No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 5 |
| Emergency School Aid Act 1972 | 1 |
| Rodriguez v San Antonio… | 1 |
| Serrano v Priest | 1 |
| Title IX Education Amendments… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkPacker, Joel – Phi Delta Kappan, 2007
The National Education Association (NEA) agrees that No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act is flawed but believes it can be salvaged. The association believes that several substantive changes that overhaul the statute would produce a far better result. The NEA is not alone in calling for fundamental changes in the law. A coalition of more than 129…
Descriptors: Sanctions, Federal Legislation, Scores, Accountability
Download full textBracey, Gerald W. – Education Policy Research Unit, 2005
This brief examines how No Child Left Behind (NCLB) dollars flow from the federal government through states and districts and into the coffers of companies, mostly for-profit companies. The brief makes the case that the law enriches many private companies and individuals, especially those close to President George W. Bush and his family. The brief…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Educational Legislation, Educational Finance, Costs
Bracey, Gerald W. – Education Policy Research Unit, 2005
This brief examines how No Child Left Behind (NCLB) dollars flow from the federal government through states and districts and into the coffers of companies, mostly for-profit companies. The brief makes the case that the law enriches many private companies and individuals, especially those close to President George W. Bush and his family. The brief…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Educational Legislation, Educational Finance, Costs
Wiley, Edward W.; Mathis, William J.; Garcia, David R. – Education Policy Research Unit, 2005
This executive summary describes a study that finds nearly every school in the Great Lakes states is threatened to fail the Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) requirements mandated by the federal "No Child Left Behind" (NCLB) Act. NCLB holds schools and districts accountable for student achievement on state standardized tests and schools…
Descriptors: Federal Programs, Educational Indicators, Federal Legislation, Educational Policy
Office of Education, US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, 1974
The report presents data and discussion on U.S. education across sectors, as well as the work of the Office of Education (OE) in 1973. Among topics covered are education finance, including equalization, "Serrano v. Priest," "Rodriguez v. San Antonio Independent School District," "Barrera v. Wheeler," the National…
Descriptors: Educational Finance, Educational Equity (Finance), Court Litigation, Postsecondary Education
Wiley, Edward W.; Mathis, William J.; Garcia, David R. – Education Policy Research Unit, 2005
This study finds that nearly every school in the Great Lakes states is threatened to fail the Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) requirements mandated by the federal "No Child Left Behind" (NCLB) Act. NCLB holds schools and districts accountable for student achievement on state standardized tests and schools that do not make AYP face…
Descriptors: Achievement Gap, Social Problems, Sanctions, Federal Legislation
