Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Scaling | 3 |
| Test Construction | 3 |
| Test Reliability | 3 |
| Equated Scores | 2 |
| Essay Tests | 2 |
| High School Equivalency… | 2 |
| Multiple Choice Tests | 2 |
| Scoring | 2 |
| Test Validity | 2 |
| Testing Accommodations | 2 |
| Testing Programs | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| GED Testing Service | 2 |
Publication Type
| Guides - General | 1 |
| Guides - Non-Classroom | 1 |
| Numerical/Quantitative Data | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
| Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
| High School Equivalency… | 2 |
| Adult Education | 1 |
| High Schools | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Canada | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| General Educational… | 3 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Download full textGED Testing Service, 2014
This manual was written to provide technical information regarding the General Educational Development (GED®) test as evidence that the GED® test is technically sound. Throughout this manual, documentation is provided regarding the development of the GED® test and data collection activities, as well as evidence of reliability and validity. This…
Descriptors: High School Equivalency Programs, Equivalency Tests, Testing Programs, Test Validity
Ezzelle, Carol; Setzer, J. Carl – GED Testing Service, 2009
This manual was written to provide technical information regarding the 2002 Series GED (General Educational Development) Tests. Throughout this manual, documentation is provided regarding the development of the GED Tests, data collection activities, as well as reliability and validity evidence. The purpose of this manual is to provide evidence…
Descriptors: High School Equivalency Programs, Testing Programs, Test Validity, Test Reliability
Lukhele, Robert; Sireci, Stephen G. – 1995
Free-response (FR) item formats, such as essay questions, are popular in educational assessment. The criticisms against FR items are that they are more expensive to score, take up more testing time, provide less content coverage, and are less reliable than multiple-choice (MC) items. For these reasons, FR items are often combined with MC items.…
Descriptors: Educational Assessment, Essay Tests, Item Response Theory, Multiple Choice Tests
