Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Source
American School Board Journal | 1 |
Harvard Educational Review | 1 |
Journal of Law and Education | 1 |
NASSP Bulletin | 1 |
School Business Affairs | 1 |
Teachers College Record | 1 |
Author
Combs, Michael W. | 1 |
De Lacy, Dan R. | 1 |
Flygare, Thomas J. | 1 |
Gooden, John S. | 1 |
Horsford, Sonya Douglass | 1 |
Hyde, Alison A. | 1 |
Kirp, David L. | 1 |
Lyons, James E. | 1 |
Williams, Michael L. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 6 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Legal/Legislative/Regulatory… | 2 |
Opinion Papers | 2 |
Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Location
Michigan | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Brown v Board of Education | 7 |
Bill of Rights | 1 |
Elementary and Secondary… | 1 |
Keyes v Denver School… | 1 |
Milliken v Bradley | 1 |
Missouri v Jenkins | 1 |
Pickering v Board of Education | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Horsford, Sonya Douglass – Teachers College Record, 2016
Background/Context: In "Milliken v. Bradley" (1974), the U.S. Supreme Court deemed unconstitutional a metropolitan-wide desegregation plan in Detroit that sought to achieve racial balance in part by busing white suburban students to the city's majority black schools. In a stark departure from "Brown v. Board of Education of…
Descriptors: Educational Legislation, Federal Legislation, Desegregation Litigation, School Desegregation

Hyde, Alison A. – NASSP Bulletin, 1994
Examines the courts' role in desegregating American schools in the 40 years since "Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas" and discusses reasons why desegregation is still a desirable goal for public schools. Having recognized its limited power to end segregation during the 1970s, the U.S. Supreme Court is gradually relinquishing…
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Desegregation Effects, Educational History, Elementary Secondary Education

Combs, Michael W. – Journal of Law and Education, 1984
Surveys school desegregation litigation and policy interpretation at three federal judiciary levels. Finds the Supreme Court championing local school control, while district courts and the courts of appeals read remedial powers of federal courts more expansively. (MD)
Descriptors: Black Influences, Civil Rights, Court Litigation, Decision Making
Lyons, James E.; Gooden, John S. – School Business Affairs, 2001
Title I, concerned with providing equal learning opportunities for disadvantaged students, is the 1965 Elementary and Secondary Education Act's centerpiece and has been institutionalized in U.S. schools. Recent reauthorizations have allowed local districts and schools to determine which type of program will best serve students' needs. (18…
Descriptors: Accountability, Compliance (Legal), Court Litigation, Disadvantaged Youth
Williams, Michael L.; De Lacy, Dan R. – American School Board Journal, 1996
In a recent series of decisions, the Supreme Court has set the standard for returning control of vital school affairs to local school officials. Discusses the legal bases school officials and their legal counsel might use in showing that their school district has attained so-called unitary status, the condition for lifting federal desegregation…
Descriptors: Court Role, Desegregation Litigation, Desegregation Methods, Elementary Secondary Education

Kirp, David L. – Harvard Educational Review, 1981
Kirp examines the evolution of Supreme Court doctrine since the Brown decision, the course of specific desegregation cases, and the interchange between political institutions and the courts at the local level. He reveals that the decision-making process in school desegregation is both political and constitutional. (Author/SK)
Descriptors: Constitutional Law, Court Judges, Court Role, Desegregation Litigation
Flygare, Thomas J. – 1984
This paper argues that courts have tended to identify and enforce individual rights at the expense, in many instances, of the ability of school boards and legislatures to carry out what they perceive to be the will of the majority of voters in their jurisdictions. The trend emphasizing individual rights began in 1954 with the Supreme Court…
Descriptors: Board of Education Role, Civil Rights Legislation, Constitutional Law, Court Litigation