Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 2 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 3 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 3 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Author
| Ginger V. Shultz | 3 |
| Amber J. Dood | 2 |
| Field M. Watts | 1 |
| Ina Zaimi | 1 |
| Jasen Chen | 1 |
| Jon-Marc G. Rodriguez | 1 |
| Michael N. Petterson | 1 |
| Safron L. Milne | 1 |
| Solaire A. Finkenstaedt-Quinn | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Research | 3 |
| Tests/Questionnaires | 2 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 3 |
| Postsecondary Education | 3 |
Audience
Location
| Michigan | 1 |
| Michigan (Ann Arbor) | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkField M. Watts; Amber J. Dood; Ginger V. Shultz; Jon-Marc G. Rodriguez – Journal of Chemical Education, 2023
Chemistry education research demonstrates the value of open-ended writing tasks, such as writing-to-learn (WTL) assignments, for supporting students' learning with topics including reasoning about reaction mechanisms. The emergence of generative artificial intelligence (AI)technology, such as chatbots ChatGPT and Bard, raises concerns regarding…
Descriptors: College Students, Science Instruction, Organic Chemistry, Thinking Skills
Ina Zaimi; Amber J. Dood; Ginger V. Shultz – Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 2024
Asking students to explain why phenomena occur at a molecular level is vital to increasing their understanding of chemistry concepts. One way to elicit students' mechanistic reasoning and guide construction of knowledge is through Writing-to-Learn (WTL), which is a promising approach for students in organic chemistry courses. In the design of WTL…
Descriptors: Writing Assignments, Teaching Methods, Science Instruction, Scientific Concepts
Student Experiences with Peer Review and Revision for Writing-to-Learn in a Chemistry Course Context
Solaire A. Finkenstaedt-Quinn; Safron L. Milne; Michael N. Petterson; Jasen Chen; Ginger V. Shultz – Written Communication, 2024
Peer review is useful for providing students with formative feedback, yet it is used less frequently in STEM classrooms and for supporting writing-to-learn (WTL). While research indicates the benefits of incorporating peer review into classrooms, less research is focused on students' perceptions thereof. Such research is important as it speaks to…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Formative Evaluation, Feedback (Response), STEM Education
