Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Program Evaluation | 6 |
Scientific Research | 6 |
Research and Development | 4 |
Questionnaires | 3 |
Federal Programs | 2 |
Foreign Countries | 2 |
Higher Education | 2 |
Industry | 2 |
Investment | 2 |
Program Descriptions | 2 |
Research and Development… | 2 |
More ▼ |
Author
Castori, Pam | 1 |
Critchley, Christa | 1 |
Fojt, Otakar | 1 |
Gray, Denis | 1 |
Helms, Jenifer V. | 1 |
Hiltz, Starr Roxanne | 1 |
Hirabayashi, Judy | 1 |
Lopez, Laurie | 1 |
Manathunga, Catherine | 1 |
Phillips, Michelle | 1 |
Pitt, Rachael | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 4 |
Journal Articles | 3 |
Collected Works - General | 1 |
Numerical/Quantitative Data | 1 |
Reference Materials -… | 1 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Adult Education | 1 |
Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Administrators | 1 |
Policymakers | 1 |
Teachers | 1 |
Location
Australia | 1 |
California | 1 |
Czech Republic | 1 |
District of Columbia | 1 |
Hungary | 1 |
Indiana | 1 |
Minnesota | 1 |
New Mexico | 1 |
New York | 1 |
North Carolina | 1 |
Oregon | 1 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Vlk, Aleš; Fojt, Otakar; Stanzel, Jirí – Hungarian Educational Research Journal, 2020
The purpose of our contribution is to discuss shortcomings of purely descriptive quantitative evaluation of research policies -- based either on inputs (public investment, number of researchers), or outputs (publications, EU grants, number of patents). To give an example, we compare selected indicators across Visegrad countries in the period…
Descriptors: Program Evaluation, Research and Development, Input Output Analysis, Investment
Manathunga, Catherine; Pitt, Rachael; Critchley, Christa – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2009
The provision of diversified research training is regarded as one of the most significant contributions made by the Australian Cooperative Research Centres (CRC) programme [Howard Partners 2003, Evaluation of the cooperative research centres programme, Department of Education, Science and Training, Canberra, ACT]. Yet, a systematic evaluation of…
Descriptors: Industry, Graduates, Research and Development Centers, Measures (Individuals)
Hiltz, Starr Roxanne – 1981
Presented is a case study of several scientific communities which used a computerized conferencing system (Electronic Information Exchange System--EIES) for a period of two years to enhance their communications and carry out cooperative tasks. Though it focuses on one particular system, it was designed to yield some data that make possible direct…
Descriptors: Communications, Computer Oriented Programs, Higher Education, Information Networks

Gray, Denis; And Others – Evaluation Review, 1986
This study describes an empirical evaluation and comparison of two federally funded programs designed to foster Industry-University (I-U) cooperation. Results indicate that participants in I-U Projects perceive applied objectives like patent development as the most important goal of their collaboration, whereas I-U Centers promote a more basic…
Descriptors: Communication (Thought Transfer), Cooperative Programs, Federal Aid, Higher Education
Vaughan, Willard S., Ed. – 1989
This report documents research and development performed by principal investigators under the sponsorship of the Office of Naval Research Cognitive and Neural Sciences Division during fiscal year 1989. Programs are conducted under contracts and grants awarded on the basis of proposals received in response to a Broad Agency Announcement in the…
Descriptors: Behavioral Science Research, Cognitive Processes, Federal Programs, Intelligence
St. John, Mark; Helms, Jenifer V.; Castori, Pam; Hirabayashi, Judy; Lopez, Laurie; Phillips, Michelle – Inverness Research, 2009
The documents enclosed in this report provide a comprehensive and systematic review of the progress made in developing a network organization capable of supporting nanoscience education for the public on a national scale. There is a logic to the studies that were done and to the reports that are included in this notebook. The following are the…
Descriptors: Workshops, Leadership, Administrators, Scientists