Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Scores | 2 |
| Testing Programs | 2 |
| Academic Achievement | 1 |
| Accountability | 1 |
| Achievement Tests | 1 |
| Educational Change | 1 |
| Educational Policy | 1 |
| Educational Quality | 1 |
| Educational Testing | 1 |
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| Motivation | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Educational Assessment | 2 |
Author
| Bhola, Dennison S. | 1 |
| Cizek, Gregory J. | 1 |
| Crandell, Jan | 1 |
| Hirsch, Thomas | 1 |
| Trent, E. Roger | 1 |
| Wise, Steven L. | 1 |
| Wise, Vicki L. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkWise, Vicki L.; Wise, Steven L.; Bhola, Dennison S. – Educational Assessment, 2006
Accountability for educational quality is a priority at all levels of education. Low-stakes testing is one way to measure the quality of education that students receive and make inferences about what students know and can do. Aggregate test scores from low-stakes testing programs are suspect, however, to the degree that these scores are influenced…
Descriptors: Motivation, Scores, Test Validity, Accountability
Peer reviewedCizek, Gregory J.; Hirsch, Thomas; Trent, E. Roger; Crandell, Jan – Educational Assessment, 2001
Studied a policy requiring students to obtain a specified level of performance on a state's reading proficiency test. Analyses of the scores of 5,611 students show a high degree of agreement among educators' judgments and students' performance, but they also show that educators' operational definitions of adequate preparation in reading vary in…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Achievement Tests, Educational Change, Educational Policy
