Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Difficulty Level | 3 |
Psychology | 3 |
Scores | 3 |
College Students | 2 |
Introductory Courses | 2 |
Test Items | 2 |
Academic Achievement | 1 |
Accuracy | 1 |
Biological Sciences | 1 |
Computer Assisted Testing | 1 |
Educational Benefits | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Teaching of Psychology | 3 |
Author
Ali, Rahan S. | 1 |
Gordon, Alexander J. | 1 |
Laffitte, Rondeau G., Jr. | 1 |
Levine, Max E. | 1 |
Matchock, Robert L. | 1 |
Nevid, Jeffrey S. | 1 |
Peck, Andrew C. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Nevid, Jeffrey S.; Gordon, Alexander J. – Teaching of Psychology, 2018
The present study hypothesized that requiring use of an integrated learning system (ILS) would yield a learning benefit in a classroom situation. Two sections of an introductory psychology course taught by the same instructor and using the same text and exams differed with respect to whether online quizzing and concept mastery exercises in an ILS…
Descriptors: Integrated Learning Systems, Educational Benefits, Introductory Courses, Psychology

Laffitte, Rondeau G., Jr. – Teaching of Psychology, 1984
A study involving undergraduate college students enrolled in an introductory psychology course showed that test item arrangement by difficulty or by order of content presentation has no effect on total achievement test score. The data also fail to demonstrate any influence of test item order on student perception of test difficulty. (RM)
Descriptors: Difficulty Level, Educational Research, Higher Education, Psychology
Peck, Andrew C.; Ali, Rahan S.; Matchock, Robert L.; Levine, Max E. – Teaching of Psychology, 2006
Conventional wisdom is that some topics in introductory psychology are more difficult for students than others. Such wisdom seems reasonable given mismatches between students' and instructors' expectations and variations in both instructor expertise and student motivation across topical areas. Five instructors pooled students' exam performance…
Descriptors: Introductory Courses, Psychology, Academic Achievement, Scores