Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 8 |
Descriptor
Adaptive Testing | 15 |
Comparative Analysis | 15 |
Scores | 15 |
Computer Assisted Testing | 13 |
Test Items | 5 |
Item Banks | 4 |
Simulation | 4 |
Test Format | 4 |
Computation | 3 |
Test Construction | 3 |
Ability | 2 |
More ▼ |
Source
Author
Bennett, Randy Elliot | 1 |
Cole, Jason C. | 1 |
DeAyala, R. J. | 1 |
Fergadiotis, Gerasimos | 1 |
Fritts, Barbara E. | 1 |
Guo, Fanmin | 1 |
Han, Kyung T. | 1 |
Hula, William D. | 1 |
Kellough, Stacey | 1 |
Kim, Sooyeon | 1 |
Koch, William R. | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 11 |
Journal Articles | 10 |
Reports - Evaluative | 3 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 2 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
Early Childhood Education | 1 |
Elementary Education | 1 |
Grade 1 | 1 |
Grade 3 | 1 |
Grade 7 | 1 |
Higher Education | 1 |
Kindergarten | 1 |
Middle Schools | 1 |
Primary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Turkey | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Early Childhood Longitudinal… | 1 |
SAT (College Admission Test) | 1 |
State Trait Anxiety Inventory… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Mao, Xiuzhen; Ozdemir, Burhanettin; Wang, Yating; Xiu, Tao – Online Submission, 2016
Four item selection indexes with and without exposure control are evaluated and compared in multidimensional computerized adaptive testing (CAT). The four item selection indices are D-optimality, Posterior expectation Kullback-Leibler information (KLP), the minimized error variance of the linear combination score with equal weight (V1), and the…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Test Items
Senel, Selma; Kutlu, Ömer – European Journal of Special Needs Education, 2018
This paper examines listening comprehension skills of visually impaired students (VIS) using computerised adaptive testing (CAT) and reader-assisted paper-pencil testing (raPPT) and student views about them. Explanatory mixed method design was used in this study. Sample is comprised of 51 VIS, in 7th and 8th grades. 9 of these students were…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Adaptive Testing, Visual Impairments, Student Attitudes
Hula, William D.; Kellough, Stacey; Fergadiotis, Gerasimos – Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 2015
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to develop a computerized adaptive test (CAT) version of the Philadelphia Naming Test (PNT; Roach, Schwartz, Martin, Grewal, & Brecher, 1996), to reduce test length while maximizing measurement precision. This article is a direct extension of a companion article (Fergadiotis, Kellough, & Hula, 2015),…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Adaptive Testing, Naming, Test Construction
Yao, Lihua – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2014
The intent of this research was to find an item selection procedure in the multidimensional computer adaptive testing (CAT) framework that yielded higher precision for both the domain and composite abilities, had a higher usage of the item pool, and controlled the exposure rate. Five multidimensional CAT item selection procedures (minimum angle;…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Adaptive Testing, Test Items, Selection
Kim, Sooyeon; Moses, Tim; Yoo, Hanwook Henry – ETS Research Report Series, 2015
The purpose of this inquiry was to investigate the effectiveness of item response theory (IRT) proficiency estimators in terms of estimation bias and error under multistage testing (MST). We chose a 2-stage MST design in which 1 adaptation to the examinees' ability levels takes place. It includes 4 modules (1 at Stage 1, 3 at Stage 2) and 3 paths…
Descriptors: Item Response Theory, Computation, Statistical Bias, Error of Measurement
Talento-Miller, Eileen; Guo, Fanmin; Han, Kyung T. – International Journal of Testing, 2013
When power tests include a time limit, it is important to assess the possibility of speededness for examinees. Past research on differential speededness has examined gender and ethnic subgroups in the United States on paper and pencil tests. When considering the needs of a global audience, research regarding different native language speakers is…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, English, Scores
Fritts, Barbara E.; Marszalek, Jacob M. – Social Psychology of Education: An International Journal, 2010
This study compares the amount of test anxiety experienced on a computerized adaptive test (CAT) to a paper-and-pencil test (P&P), as well as the state test anxiety experienced between males and females. Ninety-four middle school CAT examinees were compared to 65 middle school P&P examinees on their responses to the State-Trait Anxiety…
Descriptors: Computer Attitudes, Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Achievement Tests
Kolen, Michael J. – Educational Assessment, 1999
Develops a conceptual framework that addresses score comparability for performance assessments, adaptive tests, paper-and-pencil tests, and alternate item pools for computerized tests. Outlines testing situation aspects that might threaten score comparability and describes procedures for evaluating the degree of score comparability. Suggests ways…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Comparative Analysis, Computer Assisted Testing, Performance Based Assessment
Rock, Donald A. – ETS Research Report Series, 2007
This paper presents a strategy for measuring cognitive gains in reading during the early school years. It is argued that accurate estimates of gain scores and their appropriate interpretation requires the use of adaptive tests with multiple criterion referenced points that mark learning milestones. It is further argued that two different measures…
Descriptors: Scores, Cognitive Development, Computation, Test Interpretation

Bennett, Randy Elliot; And Others – Special Services in the Schools, 1988
A study of Scholastic Aptitude Test scores for nine groups of students with disabilities taking special test administrations found differences in score levels among disability groups but no significant differences of measurement precision and no evidence of disadvantage for disabled students. (Author/MSE)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, College Entrance Examinations, Comparative Analysis, Disabilities
Thomasson, Gary L. – 1997
Score comparability is important to those who take tests and those who use them. One important concept related to test score comparability is that of "equity," which is defined as existing when examinees are indifferent as to which of two alternate forms of a test they would prefer to take. By their nature, computerized adaptive tests…
Descriptors: Ability, Adaptive Testing, Comparative Analysis, Computer Assisted Testing
Cole, Jason C.; Lutkus, Anthony D. – Research in the Schools, 1997
A college administered the computer-adaptive ACCUPLACER (College Board, 1995) reading placement test to 399 entering students and its paper-and-pencil version, COMPANION, to 481 students. When the age of the two groups was held constant, no differences were found between the groups. (SLD)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Age Differences, College Freshmen, Comparative Analysis
Stocking, Martha L. – 1988
The construction of parallel editions of conventional tests for purposes of test security while maintaining score comparability has always been a recognized and difficult problem in psychometrics and test construction. The introduction of new modes of test construction, e.g., adaptive testing, changes the nature of the problem, but does not make…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Comparative Analysis, Computer Assisted Testing, Identification
DeAyala, R. J.; Koch, William R. – 1986
A computerized flexilevel test was implemented and its ability estimates were compared with those of a Bayesian estimation based computerized adaptive test (CAT) as well as with known true ability estimates. Results showed that when the flexilevel test was terminated according to Lord's criterion, its ability estimates were highly and…
Descriptors: Ability, Adaptive Testing, Bayesian Statistics, Comparative Analysis

Smith, Nancy J.; And Others – 1993
Results of administering a computerized adaptive version of the Grammar, Spelling, and Punctuation Test (GSP) to students in the College of Communication at the University of Texas, Austin were studied. The computerized adaptive version (CAT) was administered for the first time in June 1992 to 35 prospective students who participated in the…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Adaptive Testing, Comparative Analysis, Computer Assisted Testing