NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 3 results Save | Export
Relations of Scores on the Stanford Binet Fourth Edition and Form L-M: Concurrent Validation Study with Children Who Have Mental Retardation.
Bower, Anna; Hayes, Alan – American Journal on Mental Retardation, 1995
This study compared global scores of 26 Australian students (ages 4 to 16) with mental retardation on the third and fourth editions of the Stanford Binet Intelligence Scale. Analysis indicated a fairly strong positive relation between the two tests, suggesting that the fourth edition may be substituted for the older instrument in longitudinal…
Descriptors: Comparative Testing, Concurrent Validity, Intelligence Tests, Mental Retardation
How Review Options and Administration Modes Influence Scores on Computerized Vocabulary Tests.
Vispoel, Walter P.; And Others – 1992
The effects of review options (the opportunity for examinees to review and change answers) on the magnitude, reliability, efficiency, and concurrent validity of scores obtained from three types of computerized vocabulary tests (fixed item, adaptive, and self-adapted) were studied. Subjects were 97 college students at a large midwestern university…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, College Students, Comparative Testing, Computer Assisted Testing
Concurrent Validity of the Cognitive Domain of the Battelle Developmental Inventory in Relation to the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Test, Fourth Edition for Urban African-American Low SES Preschool Children.
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Lidz, Carol S.; And Others – 1992
The relationship between scores on the cognitive domain of the Battelle Developmental Inventory (BDI) and scores on the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Test (SBIT), Fourth Edition, was studied for 32 urban, low socioeconomic status (SES), African American children (22 males and 10 females) aged 3 to 5 years. The BDI is a developmental inventory…
Descriptors: Black Students, Child Development, Classification, Comparative Testing