Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| At Risk Students | 1 |
| Benchmarking | 1 |
| Curriculum Based Assessment | 1 |
| Data Analysis | 1 |
| Elementary School Students | 1 |
| Error of Measurement | 1 |
| Generalizability Theory | 1 |
| Reliability | 1 |
| Scores | 1 |
| Scoring Rubrics | 1 |
| Screening Tests | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| School Psychology Quarterly | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Texas (Houston) | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkKeller-Margulis, Milena A.; Mercer, Sterett H.; Thomas, Erin L. – School Psychology Quarterly, 2016
The purpose of this study was to examine the reliability of written expression curriculum-based measurement (WE-CBM) in the context of universal screening from a generalizability theory framework. Students in second through fifth grade (n = 145) participated in the study. The sample included 54% female students, 49% White students, 23% African…
Descriptors: Generalizability Theory, Reliability, Written Language, Curriculum Based Assessment
