Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 5 |
Descriptor
| Evaluation Methods | 6 |
| Scores | 6 |
| Statistical Distributions | 6 |
| Correlation | 3 |
| Comparative Analysis | 2 |
| Reliability | 2 |
| Statistical Analysis | 2 |
| Test Bias | 2 |
| Academic Achievement | 1 |
| Accountability | 1 |
| Achievement Gains | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Journal of Educational… | 1 |
| Journal of Educational and… | 1 |
| Journal of Mental Health… | 1 |
| ProQuest LLC | 1 |
| Stanford Center for Education… | 1 |
Author
| Danov, Stacy E. | 1 |
| Feinberg, Richard A. | 1 |
| Ho, Andrew D. | 1 |
| Kalogrides, Demetra | 1 |
| Karl, Andrew T. | 1 |
| Lohr, Sharon L. | 1 |
| Meyers, Stephanie | 1 |
| Nanda, Alice O. | 1 |
| Oshima, T. C. | 1 |
| Raju, Nambury S. | 1 |
| Reardon, Sean F. | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 4 |
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Dissertations/Theses -… | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| Grade 4 | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Aberrant Behavior Checklist | 1 |
| Child Behavior Checklist | 1 |
| National Assessment of… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Download full textReardon, Sean F.; Kalogrides, Demetra; Ho, Andrew D. – Stanford Center for Education Policy Analysis, 2017
There is no comprehensive database of U.S. district-level test scores that is comparable across states. We describe and evaluate a method for constructing such a database. First, we estimate linear, reliability-adjusted linking transformations from state test score scales to the scale of the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). We…
Descriptors: School Districts, Scores, Statistical Distributions, Database Design
Direct linkFeinberg, Richard A. – ProQuest LLC, 2012
Subscores, also known as domain scores, diagnostic scores, or trait scores, can help determine test-takers' relative strengths and weaknesses and appropriately focus remediation. However, subscores often have poor psychometric properties, particularly reliability and distinctiveness (Folske, Gessaroli, & Swanson, 1999; Monaghan, 2006;…
Descriptors: Simulation, Tests, Testing, Scores
Peer reviewedKarl, Andrew T.; Yang, Yan; Lohr, Sharon L. – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2013
Value-added models have been widely used to assess the contributions of individual teachers and schools to students' academic growth based on longitudinal student achievement outcomes. There is concern, however, that ignoring the presence of missing values, which are common in longitudinal studies, can bias teachers' value-added scores.…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Teacher Effectiveness, Academic Achievement, Achievement Gains
Danov, Stacy E.; Tervo, Raymond; Meyers, Stephanie; Symons, Frank J. – Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 2012
The atypical antipsychotic medication aripiprazole was evaluated using a randomized AB multiple baseline, double-blind, placebo-controlled design for the treatment of severe problem behavior with 4 children with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Functional analysis (FA) was conducted concurrent with the medication evaluation to…
Descriptors: Developmental Disabilities, Rating Scales, Reinforcement, Drug Therapy
Oshima, T. C.; Raju, Nambury S.; Nanda, Alice O. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2006
A new item parameter replication method is proposed for assessing the statistical significance of the noncompensatory differential item functioning (NCDIF) index associated with the differential functioning of items and tests framework. In this new method, a cutoff score for each item is determined by obtaining a (1-alpha ) percentile rank score…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Statistical Distributions, Statistical Significance, Test Bias
Reckase, Mark D. – 1994
Comparative results are presented for procedures recently appearing in literature related to standard setting on the National Assessment of Educational Progress--the paper selection method and the contrasting group method. For this comparison, a probabilistic model with normal distribution of performance and a six-point scale were assumed. The…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Criteria, Educational Assessment, Elementary Secondary Education
