Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Computer Assisted Testing | 3 |
Evaluation Problems | 3 |
Scores | 3 |
Accuracy | 2 |
Academic Achievement | 1 |
Access to Education | 1 |
Adaptive Testing | 1 |
College Students | 1 |
Computer Software | 1 |
Cooperative Learning | 1 |
Disabilities | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Aouine, Amina | 1 |
Lane, Suzanne | 1 |
Leventhal, Brian | 1 |
Lipnevich, Anastasiya A. | 1 |
Mahdaoui, Latifa | 1 |
Moccozet, Laurent | 1 |
Smith, Jeffrey K. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Higher Education | 1 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 1 |
Race to the Top | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Aouine, Amina; Mahdaoui, Latifa; Moccozet, Laurent – International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 2019
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to focus on assessing individuals' problems in learning groups/teams and should lead to the assessment of the group/team itself as a learning entity. Design/methodology/approach: In this paper, an extension of the IMS-Learning Design (IMS-LD) meta-model is proposed in order to support the assessment of…
Descriptors: Cooperative Learning, Electronic Learning, Scores, Models
Lane, Suzanne; Leventhal, Brian – Review of Research in Education, 2015
This chapter addresses the psychometric challenges in assessing English language learners (ELLs) and students with disabilities (SWDs). The first section addresses some general considerations in the assessment of ELLs and SWDs, including the prevalence of ELLs and SWDs in the student population, federal and state legislation that requires the…
Descriptors: Psychometrics, Evaluation Problems, English Language Learners, Disabilities
Lipnevich, Anastasiya A.; Smith, Jeffrey K. – ETS Research Report Series, 2008
This experiment involved college students (N = 464) working on an authentic learning task (writing an essay) under 3 conditions: no feedback, detailed feedback (perceived by participants to be provided by the course instructor), and detailed feedback (perceived by participants to be computer generated). Additionally, conditions were crossed with 2…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Information Sources, College Students, Essays