NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Süleyman Demir; Derya Çobanoglu Aktan; Nese Güler – International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 2023
This study has two main purposes. Firstly, to compare the different item selection methods and stopping rules used in Computerized Adaptive Testing (CAT) applications with simulative data generated based on the item parameters of the Vocational Maturity Scale. Secondly, to test the validity of CAT application scores. For the first purpose,…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Adaptive Testing, Vocational Maturity, Measures (Individuals)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wyse, Adam E.; McBride, James R. – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2022
A common practical challenge is how to assign ability estimates to all incorrect and all correct response patterns when using item response theory (IRT) models and maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) since ability estimates for these types of responses equal -8 or +8. This article uses a simulation study and data from an operational K-12…
Descriptors: Scores, Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Test Length
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wei, Wei; Zheng, Ying – Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2017
This research provided a comprehensive evaluation and validation of the listening section of a newly introduced computerised test, Pearson Test of English Academic (PTE Academic). PTE Academic contains 11 item types assessing academic listening skills either alone or in combination with other skills. First, task analysis helped identify skills…
Descriptors: Listening Comprehension Tests, Computer Assisted Testing, Language Tests, Construct Validity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Meijer, Rob R. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2004
Two new methods have been proposed to determine unexpected sum scores on sub-tests (testlets) both for paper-and-pencil tests and computer adaptive tests. A method based on a conservative bound using the hypergeometric distribution, denoted p, was compared with a method where the probability for each score combination was calculated using a…
Descriptors: Probability, Adaptive Testing, Item Response Theory, Scores