Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Comparative Testing | 9 |
Scores | 9 |
Testing | 9 |
Standardized Tests | 5 |
Equated Scores | 4 |
Norm Referenced Tests | 4 |
Norms | 4 |
Test Interpretation | 4 |
Test Reliability | 4 |
Achievement Tests | 3 |
Grade Equivalent Scores | 3 |
More ▼ |
Author
Gallas, Edwin J. | 3 |
Ascher, Gordon | 1 |
Boldt, Robert F. | 1 |
Crowder, Christopher R. | 1 |
Hills, John R. | 1 |
Mishra, Shitala P. | 1 |
Panton, James H. | 1 |
Powers, Stephen | 1 |
Rotberg, Iris C. | 1 |
Slaughter, Helen B. | 1 |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 5 |
Journal Articles | 4 |
Guides - Non-Classroom | 1 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Higher Education | 1 |
Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Elementary and Secondary… | 2 |
No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
California Achievement Tests | 1 |
Comprehensive Tests of Basic… | 1 |
Metropolitan Achievement Tests | 1 |
Stanford Achievement Tests | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Hills, John R. – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 1983
Percentile scores appear to be the easiest standardized test scores for parents to understand. Yet in this true-false test, Hills reveals commonly held misconceptions about percentile score reports. (LC)
Descriptors: Comparative Testing, Norm Referenced Tests, Scores, Standardized Tests

Panton, James H. – Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1980
Inmates score significantly lower on the second edition (BETA II) than on the first edition (BETA I), regardless of the order of administration. BETA I score distributions were unaffected by the order of administration. BETA II score distributions depended on whether BETA II was administered first or second. (Author)
Descriptors: Comparative Testing, Institutionalized Persons, Intelligence Tests, Prisoners
Boldt, Robert F. – 1971
Scores from tests in the same battery are put on scales which are the "same" in some sense, so that certain interpretations are made easier. This is often done when scores for different tests are obtained on different population segments, especially such as newer, more varied batteries of test offerings. It is felt that traditional erroneous…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Comparative Testing, Equated Scores, Measurement Techniques

Mishra, Shitala P. – Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1982
Compared the test scores of high and low anxious subjects when the Wechsler Adult Intelligence scale was administered by a trained examiner or mechanically. Findings indicated that performance was influenced by test administration procedures. There was a trend to score higher on the test given by an examiner. (Author/JAC)
Descriptors: College Students, Comparative Testing, Examiners, Higher Education
Rotberg, Iris C. – Educational Leadership, 2006
The current preoccupation in the United States with test-based accountability is founded on a set of faulty assumptions--about education practices elsewhere in the world, about international test score comparisons, and about the extent to which test scores are valid indicators of the quality of education or the state of the economy. For example,…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Testing, Standardized Tests, Scores
Crowder, Christopher R.; Gallas, Edwin J. – 1978
Both on-level and out-of-level tests were administered to third and fifth grade children in order to compare the scaled scores of different level tests of the same testing program and to discover whether the relationship between levels might be distorted by ceiling or floor effects. Only reading tests were used in this study. The Stanford…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Comparative Testing, Difficulty Level, Elementary Education
Ascher, Gordon – 1975
The increased use of criterion-referenced statewide testing programs is an outgrowth of the need for more diagnostic information for planning and decision making than is provided by norm-referenced programs. There remains, however, a need for state agencies to compare the results of local districts to a variety of comparison groups for the purpose…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Comparative Testing, Correlation, Criterion Referenced Tests
Slaughter, Helen B.; Gallas, Edwin J. – 1978
Concern was expressed for the possible effects of testing Elementary Secondary Education Act (ESEA) Title I students with norm-referenced tests that may be so difficult that many students will have scores in the chance range. The likelihood of such students obtaining equal scaled scores if they were tested with easier out-of-level tests was…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Comparative Testing, Disadvantaged Youth, Equated Scores
Powers, Stephen; Gallas, Edwin J. – 1978
Fourth, seventh, and ninth grade students in Elementary Secondary Education Act (ESEA) Title I programs were tested with the reading comprehension subtests of the Comprehensive Tests of Basic Skills, at each of two levels: on-level for each respective grade, and an easier out-of-level form. Approximately half of these students were found to be…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Comparative Testing, Compensatory Education, Difficulty Level